Literature DB >> 8591138

Taxonomic vocabularies in medicine: the intention of usage determines different established structures.

J Ingenerf1.   

Abstract

This paper deals with the reasons for distinguishing taxonomic vocabularies for standardizing terminology according to their different dedicated purposes. Different kinds of vocabularies are defined and then characterized using criteria like purposes, semiotic bases, principles for establishing hierarchical relations, mechanisms for guaranteeing reproducibility, and underlying representation formats. Furthermore, the kinds of taxonomic vocabularies worked out so far are named by preferred terms and assigned to proper places within the whole context of medical routine and research. Finally, it is argued that there must be a careful distinction between a conceptual level on one hand and a purpose-dependent non-conceptual level on the other. Unfortunately, both levels are crucially intertwined in existing vocabularies. Efforts on conceptually linking the vocabularies can help to share and re-use information evolving from different sources due to their common conceptual core. However, one must be aware of the effects resulting from special structural features on a non-conceptual level.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8591138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medinfo        ISSN: 1569-6332


  8 in total

1.  Structural validation of nursing terminologies.

Authors:  N R Hardiker; A L Rector
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Collaborative efforts for representing nursing concepts in computer-based systems: international perspectives.

Authors:  A Coenen; H F Marin; H A Park; S Bakken
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Appraisal of the MedDRA conceptual structure for describing and grouping adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Cédric Bousquet; Georges Lagier; Agnès Lillo-Le Louët; Christine Le Beller; Alain Venot; Marie-Christine Jaulent
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  What nurses do: use of the ISO Reference Terminology Model for Nursing Action as a framework for analyzing MICU nursing practice patterns.

Authors:  Margot Andison; Jacqueline Moss
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

5.  Representing thoughts, words, and things in the UMLS.

Authors:  K E Campbell; D E Oliver; K A Spackman; E H Shortliffe
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Modeling nursing terminology using the GRAIL representation language.

Authors:  N R Hardiker; A L Rector
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Nursing classification systems: necessary but not sufficient for representing "what nurses do" for inclusion in computer-based patient record systems.

Authors:  S B Henry; C N Mead
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  A review of major nursing vocabularies and the extent to which they have the characteristics required for implementation in computer-based systems.

Authors:  S B Henry; J J Warren; L Lange; P Button
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.