Literature DB >> 8589572

Three ethically justified indications for selective termination in multifetal pregnancy: a practical and comprehensive management strategy.

F A Chervenak1, L B McCullough, R Wapner.   

Abstract

The authors provide an ethical justification for three indications for performing selective termination of multi-fetal pregnancies. These indications are (1) achieving a pregnancy that results in a live birth or one or more infants with minimal neonatal morbidity and mortality, (2) achieving a pregnancy that results in a live birth of one or more infants without antenatally detected anomalies, and (3) achieving a pregnancy that results in a singleton live birth. This ethical justification is based on two basic approaches to obstetric ethics that emphasize that these indications must be established on the basis of informed consent. The authors underscore the importance of matters of private conscience and demonstrate the consistency of ethical justification with existing public policy in the United States.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8589572     DOI: 10.1007/bf02212916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  10 in total

1.  Selective termination to a singleton pregnancy is ethically justified.

Authors:  F A Chervenak; L B McCullough; R J Wapner
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Selective termination in multiple pregnancies: ethical considerations.

Authors:  R M Zaner; F H Boehm; G A Hill
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Selective termination of pregnancy and women's reproductive autonomy.

Authors:  C Overall
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Selective reduction--a perinatal necessity?

Authors:  J C Hobbins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-04-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. Life, liberty, and law in conflict.

Authors:  L J Nelson; N Milliken
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Protecting the liberty of pregnant patients.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-05-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Selective first-trimester termination in octuplet and quadruplet pregnancies: clinical and ethical issues.

Authors:  M I Evans; J C Fletcher; I E Zador; B W Newton; M H Quigg; C D Struyk
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Attitudes on the ethics of abortion, sex selection, and selective pregnancy termination among health care professionals, ethicists, and clergy likely to encounter such situations.

Authors:  M I Evans; A Drugan; S F Bottoms; L D Platt; C A Rodeck; M Hansmann; J C Fletcher
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Transabdominal versus transcervical and transvaginal multifetal pregnancy reduction: international collaborative experience of more than one thousand cases.

Authors:  M I Evans; M Dommergues; I Timor-Tritsch; I E Zador; R J Wapner; L Lynch; Y Dumez; J D Goldberg; K H Nicolaides; M P Johnson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies.

Authors:  R J Wapner; G H Davis; A Johnson; V J Weinblatt; R L Fischer; L G Jackson; F A Chervenak; L B McCullough
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-01-13       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.