Literature DB >> 8588793

The effects of motion direction, body axis, and posture on motion sickness induced by low frequency linear oscillation.

J F Golding1, H M Markey, J R Stott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recent experiment demonstrated that low frequency linear oscillation through the Z-axis of the body was more nauseogenic when applied in the vertical direction, with subjects seated upright, than in the horizontal direction, with subjects supine. HYPOTHESIS: The nauseogenicity of low frequency linear oscillatory motion is dependent on direction of motion with respect to the gravity vector, orientation of body axis with respect to motion, and body posture.
METHODS: The following conditions were compared: A) seated upright, with horizontal motion, X-axis; B) seated upright, with vertical motion, Z-axis; and C) supine, with vertical motion, X-axis. Sinusoidal motion at 0.35 Hz, 3.6 m.s-2 peak was used in all conditions. Two experiments were performed. In Experiment 1 subjects (n = 28) were exposed to conditions A and B. In Experiment 2 subjects (n = 12) were exposed to conditions A, B and C.
RESULTS: Horizontal motion (condition A) was found to be twice as nauseogenic (p < 0.05 to p < 0.0001) as vertical motion (condition B), but there was no difference in nauseogenicity between upright and supine postures for vertical motion (condition B vs. C). Mean motion exposure times to achieve moderate nausea were: Experiment 1: A) 9.0 min.; B) 22.4 min.; Experiment 2: A) 15.3 min.; B) 27.1 min.; C) 22.5 min.
CONCLUSIONS: These results, taken together with those of the previous experiment, suggest that upright vs. supine body posture and stimulation through X- vs. Z-axis, both enhance the nauseogenicity of low frequency linear oscillation, these effects are additive, but that motion direction with respect to the gravity vector (horizontal vs. vertical) is a less important factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8588793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  6 in total

1.  Motion sickness on tilting trains.

Authors:  Bernard Cohen; Mingjia Dai; Dmitri Ogorodnikov; Jean Laurens; Theodore Raphan; Philippe Müller; Alexiou Athanasios; Jürgen Edmaier; Thomas Grossenbacher; Klaus Stadtmüller; Ueli Brugger; Gerald Hauser; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Motion sickness diagnostic criteria: Consensus Document of the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society.

Authors:  Yoon-Hee Cha; John F Golding; Behrang Keshavarz; Joseph Furman; Ji-Soo Kim; Jose A Lopez-Escamez; Måns Magnusson; Bill J Yates; Ben D Lawson
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.354

Review 3.  Moving in a Moving World: A Review on Vestibular Motion Sickness.

Authors:  Giovanni Bertolini; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Determinants of Motion Sickness in Tilting Trains: Coriolis/Cross-Coupling Stimuli and Tilt Delay.

Authors:  Giovanni Bertolini; Meek Angela Durmaz; Kim Ferrari; Alexander Küffer; Charlotte Lambert; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Head jitter enhances three-dimensional motion perception.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Fulvio; Huiyuan Miao; Bas Rokers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Objective and subjective responses to motion sickness: the group and the individual.

Authors:  Tugrul Irmak; Daan M Pool; Riender Happee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.