Literature DB >> 8588608

Advantages of disadvantages expected and reported by cochlear implant patients.

R S Tyler1.   

Abstract

An open-ended questionnaire was administered to 20 patients using the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant and 21 patients using the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Before surgery, they were asked to list the advantages and disadvantages that they expected from their cochlear implant. Advantages were expected in the categories of: (1) speech perception when speechreading can be used (65%); (2) environmental sound perception (58%); (3) psychological effects (14%); (4) speech perception when speechreading cannot be used (49%); (5) lifestyle and social effects (42%); and (6) speech production (5%). Disadvantages were expected in: (1) equipment malfunction (42%); (2) environmental sound perception (28%); (3) speech perception when speechreading can be used (7%); (4) psychological effects (24%); (5) speech perception when speechreading is not used (7%); and (6) lifestyle and social effects (7%). Concerns were also raised about the risk of surgery (9%). After several months (4-60 mo) of using their implant, patients were asked to list the advantages and disadvantages that they actually experienced. Advantages were reported in the categories of: (1) speech perception when speechreading can be used (86%); (2) environmental sound perception (79%); (3) psychological effects (49%); (4) speech perception when speechreading cannot be used (56%); (5) lifestyle and social effects (40%); (6) speech production (14%); and (7) the reduction of tinnitus (7%). Disadvantages were reported in: (1) equipment malfunction (54%); (2) environmental sound perception (53%); (3) speech perception when speechreading can be used (26%); (4) psychological effects (12%); (5) speech perception when speechreading is not used (21%); and (6) lifestyle and social effects (9%). Concerns were also noted about the cost of surgery (14%). Thirty patients had tinnitus preoperatively. Without hearing sound through the implant, 70 percent of these indicated that the cochlear implant had a positive effect on their tinnitus. When listening to speech through the implant, 83 percent reported that their tinnitus was reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8588608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  10 in total

1.  A Series of Case Studies of Tinnitus Suppression With Mixed Background Stimuli in a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; A J Keiner; Kurt Walker; Aniruddha K Deshpande; Shelley Witt; Matthijs Killian; Helena Ji; Jim Patrick; Norbert Dillier; Pim van Dijk; Wai Kong Lai; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  [Hearing aids, implantable hearing aids and cochlear implants in chronic tinnitus therapy].

Authors:  H Olze; T Zahnert; G Hesse
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Health-Related Quality of Life Changes Associated With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Peter R Dixon; David Feeny; George Tomlinson; Sharon Cushing; Joseph M Chen; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  [Cochlear implants and tinnitus].

Authors:  H Olze
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Perception of environmental sounds by experienced cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Brian Gygi; Min-Yu Cheng; Jay Vachhani; Megan Mulvey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Changes in the tinnitus handicap questionnaire after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Tao Pan; Richard S Tyler; Haihong Ji; Claudia Coelho; Anne K Gehringer; Stephanie A Gogel
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Changes in Tinnitus by Cochlear Implantation: A Parametric Study of the Effect of Single-Electrode Stimulation.

Authors:  Francka J J Kloostra; Emile de Kleine; Rolien H Free; Rutger Hofman; Pim Van Dijk
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Identification and Discrimination of Sound Textures in Hearing-Impaired and Older Listeners.

Authors:  Oliver Scheuregger; Jens Hjortkjær; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Are There Real-world Benefits to Bimodal Listening?

Authors:  Sarah Nyirjesy; Cole Rodman; Terrin N Tamati; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.619

10.  Curing tinnitus with a Cochlear Implant in a patient with unilateral sudden deafness: a case report.

Authors:  Tobias Kleinjung; Thomas Steffens; Juergen Strutz; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-05-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.