Literature DB >> 8588165

An apparatus for applying pure nonconstraining moments to spine segments in vitro.

N R Crawford1, A G Brantley, C A Dickman, E J Koeneman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This article reports on the design and use of a new apparatus for creating and monitoring pure, relatively nonconstraining moments to induce flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation in cadaveric spine segments of two or more vertebrae.
OBJECTIVE: The apparatus was designed to take advantage of the precision and control available in a servo-hydraulic testing frame to efficiently create and monitor testing moments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Other laboratories have reported methods of flexibility testing that also use cables and pulleys. However, instead of loading the cables and pulleys using a mechanical testing frame, previous systems have used pneumatic actuators or dead weights.
METHODS: Force from a uniaxial mechanical testing frame is converted to torque applied to the specimen through a system of cables and pulleys. The cable orientation is monitored to ensure that pure moments are created. Applied moments are recorded using one or two load cells.
RESULTS: Sketches of the apparatus are presented and its operation is described.
CONCLUSION: Because the materials required to build this apparatus are inexpensive and the equipment needed for its operation is common in mechanical testing labs, this design may be useful for researchers interested in beginning in vitro spine flexibility testing with minimal expenditure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8588165     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199510000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  26 in total

1.  The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C Schilling; S Krüger; T M Grupp; G N Duda; W Blömer; A Rohlmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical Comparison of Robotically Applied Pure Moment, Ideal Follower Load, and Novel Trunk Weight Loading Protocols on L4-L5 Cadaveric Segments during Flexion-Extension.

Authors:  Charles R Bennett; Denis J DiAngelo; Brian P Kelly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

3.  Comparison of Intervertebral ROM in Multi-Level Cadaveric Lumbar Spines Using Distinct Pure Moment Loading Approaches.

Authors:  Brandon Santoni; Andres F Cabezas; Daniel J Cook; Matthew S Yeager; James B Billys; Benjamin Whiting; Boyle C Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

4.  The effect of design parameters of interspinous implants on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Christoph Schilling; M Pfeiffer; T M Grupp; W Blömer; A Rohlmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical comparison of two different concepts for stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Philipp Schleicher; R Gerlach; B Schär; C M J Cain; W Achatz; R Pflugmacher; N P Haas; F Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [Effect of lumbar hybrid instrumentation and rigid fusion on the treated and the adjacent segments. A biomechanical study].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; M Akbar; C H Fürstenberg; C Carstens; S Hemmer; C Schilling
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  The mechanical axes of the wrist are oriented obliquely to the anatomical axes.

Authors:  Joseph J Crisco; Wendell M R Heard; Ryan R Rich; David J Paller; Scott W Wolfe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Limitations of current in vitro test protocols for investigation of instrumented adjacent segment biomechanics: critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  David Volkheimer; Masoud Malakoutian; Thomas R Oxland; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Biomechanics of Cervical "Skip" Corpectomy Versus Standard Multilevel Corpectomy.

Authors:  Murat Yilmaz; Kasim Zafer Yüksel; Seungwon Baek; Anna G U S Newcomb; Sedat Dalbayrak; Volker K H Sonntag; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.876

10.  In vitro spine testing using a robot-based testing system: comparison of displacement control and "hybrid control".

Authors:  Kevin M Bell; Robert A Hartman; Lars G Gilbertson; James D Kang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.