Literature DB >> 8585280

Adjuvants for human vaccines--current status, problems and future prospects.

R K Gupta1, G R Siber.   

Abstract

Adjuvants help antigen to elicit an early, high and long-lasting immune response with less antigen, thus saving on vaccine production costs. In recent years, adjuvants received much attention because of the development of purified, subunit and synthetic vaccines which are poor immunogens and require adjuvants to evoke the immune response. With the use of adjuvants immune response can be selectively modulated to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I or MHC class II and Th1 or Th2 type, which is very important for protection against diseases caused by intracellular pathogens such as viruses, parasites and bacteria (Mycobacterium). A number of problems are encountered in the development and use of adjuvants for human vaccines. The biggest issue with the use of adjuvants for human vaccines, particularly routine childhood vaccines, is the toxicity and adverse side-effects of most of the adjuvant formulations. At present the choice of adjuvants for human vaccination reflects a compromise between a requirement for adjuvanticity and an acceptable low level of side-effects. Other problems with the development of adjuvants include restricted adjuvanticity of certain formulations to a few antigens, use of aluminum adjuvants as reference adjuvant preparations under suboptimal conditions, non-availability of reliable animal models, use of non-standard assays and biological differences between animal models and humans leading to the failure of promising formulations to show adjuvanticity in clinical trials. The most common adjuvants for human use today are still aluminum hydroxide and aluminum phosphate, although calcium phosphate and oil emulsions also have some use in human vaccinations. During the last 15 years much progress has been made on development, isolation and chemical synthesis of alternative adjuvants such as derivatives of muramyl dipeptide, monophosphoryl lipid A, liposomes, QS21, MF-59 and immunostimulating complexes (ISCOMS). Other areas in adjuvant research which have received much attention are the controlled release of vaccine antigens using biodegradable polymer microspheres and reciprocal enhanced immunogenicity of protein-polysaccharide conjugates. Biodegradable polymer microspheres are being evaluated for targeting antigens on mucosal surfaces and for controlled release of vaccines with an aim to reduce the number of doses required for primary immunization. Reciprocal enhanced immunogenicity of protein-polysaccharide conjugates will be useful for the development of combination vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8585280     DOI: 10.1016/0264-410x(95)00011-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  114 in total

1.  Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease: the implications for Canada.

Authors:  Sarah Kahn; Dorothy W Geale; Paul R Kitching; Alice Bouffard; Denis G Allard; J Robert Duncan
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 2.  The development and use of vaccine adjuvants.

Authors:  Robert Edelman
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 3.  Design considerations for liposomal vaccines: influence of formulation parameters on antibody and cell-mediated immune responses to liposome associated antigens.

Authors:  Douglas S Watson; Aaron N Endsley; Leaf Huang
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Injectable polymer microspheres enhance immunogenicity of a contraceptive peptide vaccine.

Authors:  Chengji Cui; Vernon C Stevens; Steven P Schwendeman
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Chitosan solution enhances both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to subcutaneous vaccination.

Authors:  David A Zaharoff; Connie J Rogers; Kenneth W Hance; Jeffrey Schlom; John W Greiner
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  Human health risk assessment for aluminium, aluminium oxide, and aluminium hydroxide.

Authors:  Daniel Krewski; Robert A Yokel; Evert Nieboer; David Borchelt; Joshua Cohen; Jean Harry; Sam Kacew; Joan Lindsay; Amal M Mahfouz; Virginie Rondeau
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.393

7.  The role of antigen-presenting cells and interleukin-12 in the priming of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells by immune stimulating complexes.

Authors:  Neil C Robson; Helen Beacock-Sharp; Anne M Donachie; Allan McI Mowat
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.397

8.  Prototype Alzheimer's disease epitope vaccine induced strong Th2-type anti-Abeta antibody response with Alum to Quil A adjuvant switch.

Authors:  Anahit Ghochikyan; Mikayel Mkrtichyan; Irina Petrushina; Nina Movsesyan; Adrine Karapetyan; David H Cribbs; Michael G Agadjanyan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Primary CD8+ T-cell response to soluble ovalbumin is improved by chloroquine treatment in vivo.

Authors:  Bruno Garulli; Maria G Stillitano; Vincenzo Barnaba; Maria R Castrucci
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2008-08-27

10.  Whole virus influenza vaccine activates dendritic cells (DC) and stimulates cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) while subunit vaccines support T cell proliferation.

Authors:  M Saurwein-Teissl; K Zisterer; T L Schmitt; R Glück; S Cryz; B Grubeck-Loebenstein
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.