Literature DB >> 8584846

Exercise performance of lower-extremity amputees.

K H Ward1, M C Meyers.   

Abstract

A comparison of the literature quantifying the energy expended during ambulation of healthy individuals and those with amputation of the lower extremity is difficult as study parameters and methods are inconsistent. However, the energy cost of ambulation is greater for amputees than for nonamputees. Ascending level of amputation appears to be associated with increasing metabolic demand. There appears to be a difference in energy cost of ambulation following different surgical procedures. The literature regarding energy cost of ambulating with different lower-extremity prostheses is equivocal, with the exception of the contoured adducted trochanteric-controlled alignment method (CAT-CAM) socket for above-knee amputees and the new energy-storing (Proteor) foot for traumatic below-knee amputees, which may decrease energy expenditure during ambulation. Therefore, it is reasonable to recommend that energy cost of ambulation be considered when deciding on the most efficacious surgical procedure, and metabolic efficiency of gait be considered when selecting prostheses most suitable for lower-extremity amputees. Though limited research is currently available, it appears that training or physical conditioning for the lower-extremity amputee, particularly with cardiopulmonary or vascular insufficiency, may decrease the metabolic cost of ambulation. More research is needed regarding the benefits of aerobic exercise and the safest, most effective exercise regimens for reducing metabolic costs of ambulation in lower-extremity amputees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8584846     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199520040-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  44 in total

1.  Comparative work stress for above-knee amputees using artificial legs or crutches.

Authors:  W J ERDMAN; T HETTINGER; F SAEZ
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1960-12

2.  Amputation of the lower extremity: an overview.

Authors:  V C Williamson
Journal:  Orthop Nurs       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.913

3.  The effect of the CAT-CAM above-knee prosthesis on functional rehabilitation.

Authors:  F Flandry; J Beskin; R B Chambers; J Perry; R L Waters; R Chavez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Oxygen uptake in normal and handicapped subjects, in relation to speed of waing beside velocity-controlled cart.

Authors:  P J Corcoran; G L Brengelmann
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  The relationship between comfortable and most metabolically efficient walking speed in persons with unilateral above-knee amputation.

Authors:  S M Jaegers; L D Vos; P Rispens; A L Hof
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Can Regular Sports Participation Slow the Aging Process? Data on Masters Athletes.

Authors:  T Kavanagh; R J Shephard
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.241

7.  Energy expenditure and cardiac response in above-knee amputees while using prostheses with open and locked knee mechanisms.

Authors:  E Isakov; Z Susak; E Becker
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl       Date:  1985

8.  Treadmill training program for a bilateral below-knee amputee patient with cardiopulmonary disease.

Authors:  J C Adler; N Mazzarella; L Puzsier; A Alba
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Bioenergetic comparison of a new energy-storing foot and SACH foot in traumatic below-knee vascular amputations.

Authors:  J M Casillas; V Dulieu; M Cohen; I Marcer; J P Didier
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Energy demands for walking in dysvascular amputees as related to the level of amputation.

Authors:  M S Pinzur; J Gold; D Schwartz; N Gross
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sensitivity and reproducibility of accelerometry and heart rate in physical strain assessment during prosthetic gait.

Authors:  Johannes B J Bussmann; Hendrika J G van den Berg-Emons; Sonia M Angulo; Theo Stijnen; Henk J Stam
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  How Do We Assess Energy Availability and RED-S Risk Factors in Para Athletes?

Authors:  Kristin L Jonvik; Birna Vardardottir; Elizabeth Broad
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 3.  Preparing for snow-sport events at the Paralympic Games in Beijing in 2022: recommendations and remaining questions.

Authors:  K Fagher; J K Baumgart; G S Solli; H C Holmberg; J Lexell; Ø Sandbakk
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2022-02-22

Review 4.  Physiological Considerations to Support Podium Performance in Para-Athletes.

Authors:  Cameron M Gee; Melissa A Lacroix; Trent Stellingwerff; Erica H Gavel; Heather M Logan-Sprenger; Christopher R West
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-11-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.