Literature DB >> 8583635

Influenza A viruses isolated from waterfowl in two wildlife management areas of Pennsylvania.

C P Alfonso1, B S Cowen, H van Campen.   

Abstract

A survey was conducted at two wildlife management areas of Pennsylvania (USA) to evaluate an antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (AC-ELISA) for the detection of avian influenza viruses (AIV) in cloacal swabs from waterfowl and to determine the influenza A virus subtypes and the distribution of these viruses among waterfowl. We collected 330 cloacal swabs from hunter-killed waterfowl in the fall of 1990 and from cage-captured waterfowl in the summer of 1991. Thirty-one hemagglutinating agents were isolated by chicken embryo inoculation (CEI) of which 27 were influenza A viruses and four Newcastle disease viruses (NDV). The prevalence of AIV infection was 8.2%. Compared to CEI, AC-ELISA was only 15% sensitive and 61% specific. Based on the distribution of AIV by species of waterfowl, mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and American wigeons (Anas americana) were at equal risk of AIV infection even though most of the AIV isolates came from mallards. Although significant crude effects of sampling site and season on AIV recovery could be established, juvenile age was identified as the primary risk factor of AIV recovery. Twelve AIV subtypes were identified by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and neuraminidase inhibition (NI) tests. The most prevalent subytpes were H4N8 and H6N8. We concluded that AC-ELISA was not useful for the detection of AIV in cloacal swabs from waterfowl and that CEI, HI, and NI tests remain as the method of choice for AIV screening in waterfowl. Based on the results AIV infected preferentially the young which represent the high risk group in waterfowl populations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8583635     DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-31.2.179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wildl Dis        ISSN: 0090-3558            Impact factor:   1.535


  7 in total

1.  Prevalence of avian influenza and host ecology.

Authors:  László Zsolt Garamszegi; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Phylogenetic diversity among low-virulence newcastle disease viruses from waterfowl and shorebirds and comparison of genotype distributions to those of poultry-origin isolates.

Authors:  L Mia Kim; Daniel J King; Phillip E Curry; David L Suarez; David E Swayne; David E Stallknecht; Richard D Slemons; Janice C Pedersen; Dennis A Senne; Kevin Winker; Claudio L Afonso
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 3.  Connecting the study of wild influenza with the potential for pandemic disease.

Authors:  Jonathan Runstadler; Nichola Hill; Islam T M Hussein; Wendy Puryear; Mandy Keogh
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.342

4.  Cross-seasonal patterns of avian influenza virus in breeding and wintering migratory birds: a flyway perspective.

Authors:  Nichola J Hill; John Y Takekawa; Carol J Cardona; Brandt W Meixell; Joshua T Ackerman; Jonathan A Runstadler; Walter M Boyce
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 2.133

Review 5.  A Bird's Eye View of Influenza A Virus Transmission: Challenges with Characterizing Both Sides of a Co-Evolutionary Dynamic.

Authors:  Nichola J Hill; Jonathan A Runstadler
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Phylogenetic analysis of Newcastle disease viruses isolated from waterfowl in the upper midwest region of the United States.

Authors:  Naresh Jindal; Yogesh Chander; Ashok K Chockalingam; Martha de Abin; Patrick T Redig; Sagar M Goyal
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 4.099

7.  Do crocodilians get the flu? Looking for influenza A in captive crocodilians.

Authors:  Lisa Marie Davis; Erica Spackman
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol       Date:  2008-12-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.