Literature DB >> 8583601

Extravesical involvement in patients with bladder carcinoma in situ: biological and therapy implications.

E Solsona1, I Iborra, J V Ricós, J L Monrós, R Dumont, S Almenar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The biological and therapeutic implications of extravesical involvement in patients with bladder carcinoma in situ were analyzed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 138 patients with bladder carcinoma in situ 87 (63%) had extravesical involvement, including the prostate in 53, the upper urinary tract in 11 and both structures in 23 (pan-urothelial involvement). With survival free of disease as an end point, univariate and multivariate analyses were done.
RESULTS: Patients with extravesical involvement had worse survival than those with bladder carcinoma in situ alone (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis prostate involvement (p = 0.0007) and pan-urothelial involvement (p = 0.0001) were selected as significant variables. When pathological patterns were considered prostatic stromal invasion (p = 0.0002) was the only variable selected. With these data 3 patient groups with disease mortality risk were defined.
CONCLUSIONS: Prostate involvement and pan-urothelial involvement behave as independent prognostic factors, with the latter probably reflecting an extremetly diffuse character of carcinoma in situ. However, the upper urinary tract had no influence on survival. In patients with upper urinary tract and/or prostatic involvement limited to the mucosa treatment can be conservative. Patients with ductal or stromal involvement should undergo radical treatment. For upper tract involvement conservative approaches may be considered if there are no radiological signs of invasion or low grade tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8583601     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66338-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Prognostic Effect of Carcinoma In Situ in Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Derek E Thomas; Hristos Z Kaimakliotis; Kevin R Rice; Jose A Pereira; Paul Johnston; Marietta L Moore; Angela Reed; Dylan M Cregar; Cindy Franklin; Rhoda L Loman; Michael O Koch; Richard Bihrle; Richard S Foster; Timothy A Masterson; Thomas A Gardner; Chandru P Sundaram; Charles R Powell; Stephen D W Beck; David J Grignon; Liang Cheng; Costantine Albany; Noah M Hahn
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.872

2.  Best practice in the treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Anastasios Anastasiadis; Theo M de Reijke
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-02

Review 3.  Medical management of patients with refractory carcinoma in situ of the bladder.

Authors:  J C Kim; G D Steinberg
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with a history of previous urothelial cancer or painless macroscopic haematuria.

Authors:  Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse; Ulrike L Mueller-Lisse; Josef Hinterberger; Peter Schneede; Thomas Meindl; Maximilian F Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Ashish M Kamat; Joaquim Bellmunt; Matthew D Galsky; Badrinath R Konety; Donald L Lamm; David Langham; Cheryl T Lee; Matthew I Milowsky; Michael A O'Donnell; Peter H O'Donnell; Daniel P Petrylak; Padmanee Sharma; Eila C Skinner; Guru Sonpavde; John A Taylor; Prasanth Abraham; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 13.751

6.  Application of intra-arterial chemotherapy in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chengyu You; Xianhui Li; Yuelin Du; Hui Wang; Xiaojun Zhang; Tangqiang Wei; Anguo Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.