Literature DB >> 8583327

Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: report of 11 cases.

K L Greason1, W R Thompson, E C Downey, B Lo Sasso.   

Abstract

Pyloromyotomy remains the standard of care for the treatment of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Open pyloromyotomy is effective and is the gold-standard technique. The authors report on the techniques of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. The clinical courses of the first 11 infants treated with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy we with the courses of 14 infants treated recently with open pyloromyotomy. The average surgical time for the laparoscopic group was 25.4 minutes. The average time (postoperatively) until full feedings was 19.0 hours. In the open pyloromyotomy group the average surgical time was 26.1 minutes, and the time until full feedings was 23.2 hours. These results are not significantly different. When compared with open pyloromyotomy, the laparoscopic approach appears to be equally safe and effective, with superior cosmetic results. The authors believe that laparoscopic pyloromyotomy is an excellent alternative procedure for the management of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8583327     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90159-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  11 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Nigel J Hall; Jill Van Der Zee; Hock L Tan; Agostino Pierro
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  B Jaffray
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Vascular clamp stabilization of pylorus during laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Kristopher Dozier; Sunghoon Kim
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Shawn D St Peter; George W Holcomb; Casey M Calkins; J Patrick Murphy; Walter S Andrews; Ronald J Sharp; Charles L Snyder; Daniel J Ostlie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Learning curves for pediatric laparoscopy: how many operations are enough? The Amsterdam experience with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  M W N Oomen; L T Hoekstra; R Bakx; H A Heij
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: impact of experience on the results in 182 cases.

Authors:  J D W van der Bilt; W L M Kramer; D C van der Zee; N M A Bax
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Early feeding after laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: the pros and cons.

Authors:  J D W van der Bilt; W L M Kramer; D C van der Zee; N M A Bax
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on major complications.

Authors:  M W N Oomen; L T Hoekstra; R Bakx; D T Ubbink; H A Heij
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Does number of ports affect outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic pyloromyotomy? Retrospective chart-review study.

Authors:  Tariq O Abbas; Adel Ismail
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2012-02-01

10.  Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: redefining the advantages of a novel technique.

Authors:  Manuel Caceres; Donald Liu
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.