Literature DB >> 8582561

Analysis of paired Likert data: how to evaluate change and preference questions.

P K Roberson1, S J Shema, D J Mundfrom, T M Holmes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Likert scale data present unique analysis concerns that are often not recognized by nonstatistical researchers. Mean responses to a single question are frequently compared among two or more groups of moderate sample size using normal theory methods (t test, ANOVA). These tests are designed for continuous normally distributed data, but Likert responses are categorical, ordinal, and not normally distributed. The problems are further complicated when the paired nature of pre/post- or preference questioning is ignored.
METHODS: Simulated data for a single five-point Likert scale question was used to illustrate the differing conclusions that may arise from single-question Likert scale data depending on whether pairing is modeled appropriately and which statistical procedure was applied (two sample: t test or Wilcoxon rank sum; paired samples; t test, Wilcoxon signed rank, or sign test).
RESULTS: Cases are shown for which the paired responses are significantly different (indicated by the sign test), although the group mean responses to the two questions are identical (leading to nonsignificance with both paired t and signed rank tests). The sign test is shown to be appropriate and simple to apply in typical pre/post- or preference situations.
CONCLUSIONS: Correctly identifying the question of interest is critical to selecting the appropriate statistical methodology.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8582561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  8 in total

1.  Results from the Data & Democracy initiative to enhance community-based organization data and research capacity.

Authors:  Amy Carroll-Scott; Peggy Toy; Roberta Wyn; Jazmin I Zane; Steven P Wallace
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TWO INTERVENTIONS FOR EDUCATOR TRAINING IN HIV/AIDS IN SOUTH AFRICA.

Authors:  Li-Wei Chao; Jeff Gow; Olagoke Akintola; Mark V Pauly
Journal:  Int J Educ Dev Using Inf Commun Technol       Date:  2010-01-01

3.  An Interactive Ambulatory Nephrology Curriculum for Internal Medicine Interns: Design, Implementation, and Participant Feedback.

Authors:  Alexis C Gomez; Karen M Warburton; Rachel K Miller; Dan Negoianu; Jordana B Cohen
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  The Perception of the Anesthesiologist Among the Medical, Paramedical and Administrative Staff.

Authors:  Jean Selim; Marc Selim; Zoé Demailly; Thierry Wable; Thomas Clavier; Emmanuel Besnier; Bertrand Dureuil; Benoît Veber; Zoubir Djerada; Vincent Compere
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-21

5.  An Intergenerational Family Community-Based Participatory Research Prevention Program: Hemish of Walatowa Family Circle Program.

Authors:  Kevin Shendo; Anita Toya; Eleanor Tafoya; Melissa Yepa; Janice Tosa; Towana Yepa; Harriet Yepa-Waquie; Dominic Gachupin; Carol Gachupin; Kristyn Yepa; Rebecca Rae; Lorenda Belone; Greg Tafoya; Emma Noyes; Nina Wallerstein
Journal:  IHS Prim Care Provid       Date:  2012-08

6.  Role of community pharmacists in improving knowledge and glycemic control of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  R Venkatesan; A S Manjula Devi; S Parasuraman; S Sriram
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2012-01

7.  Breaking the cycle: future faculty begin teaching with learner-centered strategies after professional development.

Authors:  Diane Ebert-May; Terry L Derting; Timothy P Henkel; Jessica Middlemis Maher; Jennifer L Momsen; Bryan Arnold; Heather A Passmore
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Maximal Strength, Sprint, and Jump Performance in High-Level Female Football Players Are Maintained With a Customized Training Program During the COVID-19 Lockdown.

Authors:  Sigurd Pedersen; Dag Johansen; Andrea Casolo; Morten B Randers; Edvard H Sagelv; Boye Welde; Andreas Kjæreng Winther; Svein Arne Pettersen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.