Literature DB >> 8582477

Who's got the power? Gender differences in partners' perceptions of influence during marital problem-solving discussions.

F L Ball1, P Cowan, C P Cowan.   

Abstract

Previous research on marital communication indicates that women have more influence in marital problem solving because they raise the issues and shape the discussion. Other studies suggest that men have the power in marital problem solving. This study re-examines power and influence from the partners' point of view. Twenty-seven couples-18 with a first child under 2, and 9 undecided about having children-were videotaped while working on a self-selected problem concerning their division of family labor. Data sources included: (a) transcribed audiotaped accounts given by each partner while viewing a videotape of their problem-solving discussion; (b) self-report questionnaires; and (c) ratings by a research team of the concordance between spouses' accounts. Husbands and wives were perceived as having a primary influence on different aspects of the discussion. Women tended to raise the issues and draw men out in the early phase of the discussion, while men controlled the content and emotional depth of the later discussion phases, and largely determined the outcome. The women's accounts emphasized that their influence in the early phase was often illusory: their behavior was shaped primarily by the effort to choose strategies that would avoid upsetting their husbands. In terms of overall satisfaction with marriage, wives had greater tolerance than their husbands for conflict in the area of division of domestic labor, but less tolerance for their husbands' domination of the discussion process. Women's marital satisfaction was higher when there was concordance between spouses in their accounts of their problem-solving discussion. This research highlights the importance of eliciting spouses' own perceptions and definitions in understanding the impact of gender-linked power differences in martial communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8582477     DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1995.00303.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Process        ISSN: 0014-7370


  9 in total

Review 1.  Observation of couple conflicts: clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations.

Authors:  R E Heyman
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2001-03

2.  Forms of communication: a cross-cultural comparison of older married couples in the USA and Japan.

Authors:  B Ingersoll-Dayton; R Campbell; J Mattson
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  1998

3.  Generalizability Issues in Observational Studies of Couples: Sample Characteristics and Task Design.

Authors:  Hyoun K Kim; Deborah M Capaldi
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2007-02

4.  Classifying married adults diagnosed with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency based on spousal communication patterns using latent class analysis: insights for intervention.

Authors:  Rachel A Smith; Sara E Wienke; Michelle K Baker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Gender Differences in the Structure of Marital Quality.

Authors:  Christopher R Beam; Katherine Marcus; Eric Turkheimer; Robert E Emery
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Spouses' attachment pairings predict neuroendocrine, behavioral, and psychological responses to marital conflict.

Authors:  Lindsey A Beck; Paula R Pietromonaco; Casey J DeBuse; Sally I Powers; Aline G Sayer
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-06-17

7.  Desired change in couples: gender differences and effects on communication.

Authors:  Richard E Heyman; Ashley N Hunt-Martorano; Jill Malik; Amy M Smith Slep
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2009-08

8.  Short-Term Change in Couples' Conflict Following a Transition to Parenthood Intervention.

Authors:  Alyson F Shapiro; John M Gottman; Brandi C Fink
Journal:  Couple Family Psychol       Date:  2015-12

9.  Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: more than a wives' tale.

Authors:  Lian Bloch; Claudia M Haase; Robert W Levenson
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2013-11-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.