Literature DB >> 8580617

Follow-up of antibodies to growth hormone in 210 growth hormone-deficient children treated with different commercial preparations.

P Pirazzoli1, E Cacciari, M Mandini, A Cicognani, S Zucchini, T Sganga, M Capelli.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the immunogenicity of different commercial recombinant-growth hormone preparations. The presence of antibodies to growth hormone was tested in 210 growth hormone-deficient children at 6-month intervals during treatment for 6-66 months. The patients were treated with three preparations (groups A, B and C of 70 cases each) having the authentic growth hormone sequence. Groups A and B received hormone synthesized by the recombinant DNA technique in E. coli, while the group C preparation was produced in a mammalian cell line. The preparations showed poor immunogenicity and antibodies were found as follows: 1.4% in patients of group A (1 case: binding capacity 0.2 mg/l and Ka 3.5 10(7) l M-1), 2.8% in patients of group B (2 cases; case 1 binding capacity 0.7 mg/l and Ka 1.5 10(7) l M-1; case 2 binding capacity 0.04 mg/l and Ka of 1.8 10(8) and 6.5 10(6) l M-1), and 8.5% in group C (6 cases; binding capacity from 0.4 to less than 0.02 mg/l, Ka from 1.6 10(7) to 3.8 10(8) l M-1). Only two patients of group C presented the antibodies in two subsequent examinations; in the other patients the positivity was found once. In all patients positive samples were found at intervals of 6-24 months after the start of therapy. In all antibody-positive patients growth velocity presented no decrease at the time of antibody detection and was never different to that of negative patients. We conclude that the three commercial preparations examined showed poor immunogenicity without clinical relevance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8580617     DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1995.tb13539.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  6 in total

Review 1.  A rational approach to short stature: focus on use and abuse of growth hormone.

Authors:  J Krishna
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Recombinant murine growth hormone particles are more immunogenic with intravenous than subcutaneous administration.

Authors:  Merry Christie; Raul M Torres; Ross M Kedl; Theodore W Randolph; John F Carpenter
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 3.  A risk-benefit assessment of growth hormone use in children.

Authors:  S L Blethen; M H MacGillivray
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Effect of growth hormone and IgG aggregates on dendritic cells activation and T-cells polarization.

Authors:  Yann Gallais; Natacha Szely; François-Xavier Legrand; Arnaud Leroy; Marc Pallardy; Isabelle Turbica
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 5.126

5.  12-month effects of once-weekly sustained-release growth hormone treatment in adults with GH deficiency.

Authors:  Beverly M K Biller; Hyi-Jeong Ji; Hyunji Ahn; Conrad Savoy; E Christine Siepl; Vera Popovic; Mihail Coculescu; Josefine Roemmler; Catalin Gavrila; David M Cook; Christian J Strasburger
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Failure to achieve castrate level of serum testosterone during luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist therapy in a patient with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yoko Koh; Atsunari Kawashima; Takeshi Ujike; Akira Nagahara; Kazutoshi Fujita; Hiroshi Kiuchi; Ryoichi Imamura; Yasushi Miyagawa; Norio Nonomura; Motohide Uemura
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.389

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.