Literature DB >> 8580167

Evaluation of an indirect ELISA for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis.

F A Uzal1, A E Carrasco, S Echaide, K Nielsen, C A Robles.   

Abstract

Control and eradication of bovine brucellosis is usually based on the serological detection of antibodies. In Argentina, the rose bengal test (RB) and the buffered plate antigen test (BPA) are the 2 screening tests officially recognized, whereas the 2-mercaptoethanol test (2ME) and the tube agglutination test (SAT) are the confirmatory assays currently in use. In order to improve the serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Patagonia, Argentina, an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) kit distributed by the International Atomic Energy Agency was evaluated. Sera from negative nonvaccinated, negative but vaccinated, and positive animals were tested by all the above techniques. The specificity of the I-ELISA (98.9% and 97.2%) was similar to that of the BPA, RB, 2ME and complement fixation (CF) tests when used to test sera from negative nonvaccinated and negative but vaccinated animals, respectively. The sensitivity of the I-ELISA (98.7%) was higher than the BPA test (96.1%) and the CF test (95.2%). The I-ELISA kit evaluated in this study was thought to be a valuable tool for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the Patagonia region where little epidemiological information is available about this disease, and where large numbers of sera should be tested to obtain such information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8580167     DOI: 10.1177/104063879500700408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  8 in total

1.  Field evaluation of an indirect ELISA for detection of brucellosis in lowland Bolivia.

Authors:  P J Kerby; J L Quiroga; J J McGrane; D A Stagg
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Evaluation of a competitive ELISA for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis.

Authors:  F A Uzal; A E Carrasco; K H Nielsen
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Comparison of Different Laboratory Methods for Clinical Detection of Brucella Infection.

Authors:  B Suo; J He; C Wu; D Wang
Journal:  Bull Exp Biol Med       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 0.804

Review 4.  A review on camel brucellosis: a zoonosis sustained by ignorance and indifference.

Authors:  Lisa D Sprague; Sascha Al-Dahouk; Heinrich Neubauer
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Comparison of diagnostic tests for the detection of Brucella spp. in camel sera.

Authors:  Mayada M Gwida; Adel H El-Gohary; Falk Melzer; Herbert Tomaso; Uwe Rösler; Ulrich Wernery; Renate Wernery; Mandy C Elschner; Iahtasham Khan; Meike Eickhoff; Daniel Schöner; Heinrich Neubauer
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-12-06

6.  Development of an improved competitive ELISA based on a monoclonal antibody against lipopolysaccharide for the detection of bovine brucellosis.

Authors:  Xiaolei Wang; Yan Wang; Limei Ma; Ran Zhang; Yanyan De; Xiaowen Yang; Chuanqing Wang; Qingmin Wu
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  A case-control study of risk factors for bovine brucellosis seropositivity in Peninsular Malaysia.

Authors:  Mukhtar Salihu Anka; Latiffah Hassan; Siti Khairani-Bejo; Mohamed Abidin Zainal; Ramlan Bin Mohamad; Annas Salleh; Azri Adzhar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bayesian evaluation of three serological tests for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Bangladesh.

Authors:  A K M A Rahman; S Smit; B Devleesschauwer; P Kostoulas; E Abatih; C Saegerman; M Shamsuddin; D Berkvens; N K Dhand; M P Ward
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.451

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.