Literature DB >> 8576995

Status of nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries in 1995: a multicenter experience with 404 patients.

H L Pachter1, M M Knudson, B Esrig, S Ross, D Hoyt, T Cogbill, H Sherman, T Scalea, P Harrison, S Shackford.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management is presently considered the treatment modality of choice in over 50% of adult patients sustaining blunt hepatic trauma who meet inclusion criteria. A multicenter study was retrospectively undertaken to assess whether the combined experiences at level I trauma centers could validate the currently reported high success rate, low morbidity, and virtually nonexistent mortality associated with this approach. Thirteen level I trauma centers accrued 404 adult patients sustaining blunt hepatic injuries managed nonoperatively over the last 5 years. Seventy-two percent of the injuries resulted from motor vehicle crashes. The mean injury severity score for the entire group was 20.2 (range, 4-75), and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-computerized axial tomography scan grading was as follows: grade I, 19% (n = 76); grade II, 31% (n = 124); grade III, 36% (n = 146); grade IV, 10% (n = 42); and grade V, 4% (n = 16). There were 27 deaths (7%) in the series, with 59% directly related to head trauma. Only two deaths (0.4%) could be attributed to hepatic injury. Twenty-one (5%) complications were documented, with the most common being hemorrhage, occurring in 14 (3.5%). Only 3 (0.7%) of these 14 patients required surgical intervention, 6 were treated by transfusions alone (0.5 to 5 U), 4 underwent angio-embolization, and 1 was further observed. Other complications included 2 bilomas and 3 perihepatic abscesses (all drained percutaneously). Two small bowel injuries were initially missed (0.5%), and diagnosed 2 and 3 days after admission. Overall, 6 patients required operative intervention: 3 for hemorrhage, 2 for missed enteric injuries, and 1 for persistent sepsis after unsuccessful percutaneous drainage. Average length of stay was 13 days. Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries is clearly the treatment modality of choice in hemodynamically stable patients, irrespective of grade of injury or degree of hemoperitoneum. Current data would suggest that 50 to 80% (47% in this series) of all adult patients with blunt hepatic injuries are candidates for this form of therapy. Exactly 98.5% of patients analyzed in this study successfully avoided operative intervention. Bleeding complications are infrequently encountered (3.5%) and can often be managed nonoperatively. Although grades IV and V injuries composed 14% of the series, they represented 66.6% of the patients requiring operative intervention and thus merit constant re-evaluation and close observation in critical care units. The optimal time for follow-up computerized axial tomography scanning seems to be within 7 to 10 days after injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8576995     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199601000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  57 in total

1.  Delayed celiotomy or laparoscopy as part of the nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma.

Authors:  Christian Letoublon; Yao Chen; Catherine Arvieux; David Voirin; Irene Morra; Christophe Broux; Olivier Risse
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Interventional radiology for paediatric trauma.

Authors:  Manrita K Sidhu; Mark J Hogan; Dennis W W Shaw; Thomas Burdick
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-12-17

3.  Transcatheter arterial embolization in the trauma patient: a review.

Authors:  Jason R Bauer; Charles E Ray
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  The role of interventional radiology in trauma.

Authors:  Jennifer E Gould; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Hepatic vascular injury: clinical profile, endovascular management and outcomes.

Authors:  Bishav Mohan; Harpreet Singh Bhoday; Naved Aslam; Harpreet Kaur; Shibba Chhabra; Naresh Sood; Gurpreet Wander
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-12-26

6.  Correlating MDCT Liver Injury Grade and Clinical Outcome in Patients Without Significant Extra-hepatic Injury.

Authors:  Ravi Kumar; Atin Kumar; Vinit Baliyan; Shivanand Gamanagatti; Ashu Seith Bhalla; Raju Sharma; Amit Gupta; Subodh Kumar; M C Misra
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Liver trauma: experience in 348 cases.

Authors:  Jing-mou Gao; Ding-yuan Du; Xing-ji Zhao; Guo-long Liu; Jun Yang; Shan-hong Zhao; Xi Lin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  [Surgical management, prognostic factors, and outcome in hepatic trauma].

Authors:  R Ott; M R Schön; S Seidel; E Schuster; C Josten; J Hauss
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Peritoneal free air due to evacuation of pneumobilia in blunt abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Isaac Howley; Shea C Gregg; Daithi S Heffernan; Charles A Adams
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-10

10.  Management of liver trauma in adults.

Authors:  Nasim Ahmed; Jerome J Vernick
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2011-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.