Literature DB >> 8575418

Indications for a threshold of chemically-induced aneuploidy in vitro in human lymphocytes.

A Elhajouji1, P Van Hummelen, M Kirsch-Volders.   

Abstract

The possible existence of a threshold for compounds inducing chromosomal loss was investigated for four known aneugens (colchicine, COL; carbendazim, MBC; mebendazole, MEB; nocodazole, NOC) and two clastogens (methyl methanesulfonate, MMS; mitomycin C, MMC) using the micronucleus (MN) test in human lymphocytes. The presence of a whole chromosome in the MN was studied by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using a synthetic pancentromeric oligonucleotide probe. FISH was applied on two different MN preparations: cytokinesis-blocked MN (MNCB) assay, and MN sorted by flow cytometry. At subtoxic concentrations analyzed by MNCB and FISH, COL, MEB, MBC, and NOC induced a concentration-dependent increase in centromere-positive MN (MNCen+). MMC seemed to induce an increase in both types of MN (MNCen- and MNCen+), while MMS induced only MNCen-. On the sorted micronuclei (in a wide range of low to subtoxic concentrations), the concentration-effect profile for MNCen+, with the four aneugens tested, showed a statistically nonsignificant increase over a range of concentrations, followed by a second range of high concentrations with a statistically significant increase. To analyze the existence of a threshold, a piecewise linear regression was applied to the data. The first concentration that showed a statistically significant increase in MNCen+ was chosen as a breakpoint (0.037 microM for COL, 2.62 microM for MBC, 0.27 microM for MEB, and 0.066 microM for NOC). The statistical correlation between observed and predicted values showed a high correlation (r = 0.99), indicating a clear threshold for aneuploidy induction. However, for MMS the concentration-effect profile for MNCen+ showed a continuous concentration-dependent decrease with no threshold. With the two cytotoxicity assays used (Bio-Rad and MTT), no significant reduction was detected either in the protein content or in mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase activity with all chemicals tested for MN induction. Therefore, our data suggest that the observed thresholds were not due to indirect toxic effects but to real aneugenic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8575418     DOI: 10.1002/em.2850260405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  9 in total

Review 1.  Laser scanning cytometry for automation of the micronucleus assay.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Piotr Smolewski; Elena Holden; Ed Luther; Mel Henriksen; Maxime François; Wayne Leifert; Michael Fenech
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  In vivo elimination of acentric double minutes containing amplified MYCN from neuroblastoma tumor cells through the formation of micronuclei.

Authors:  A Valent; J Bénard; B Clausse; M Barrois; D Valteau-Couanet; M J Terrier-Lacombe; B Spengler; A Bernheim
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Miniaturized flow cytometric in vitro micronucleus assay represents an efficient tool for comprehensively characterizing genotoxicity dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Jeffrey C Bemis; Souk Phonethepswath; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Seven benzimidazole pesticides combined at sub-threshold levels induce micronuclei in vitro.

Authors:  Sibylle Ermler; Martin Scholze; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  A mode-of-action approach for the identification of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Lya G Hernández; Jan van Benthem; George E Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluation of cell types for assessment of cytogenetic damage in arsenic exposed population.

Authors:  Pritha Ghosh; Arindam Basu; Keshav K Singh; Ashok K Giri
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 27.401

7.  Micronuclei in genotoxicity assessment: from genetics to epigenetics and beyond.

Authors:  Lidiya Luzhna; Palak Kathiria; Olga Kovalchuk
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Genotoxicity of flubendazole and its metabolites in vitro and the impact of a new formulation on in vivo aneugenicity.

Authors:  David J Tweats; George E Johnson; Ivan Scandale; James Whitwell; Dean B Evans
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 9.  Thresholds of Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens.

Authors:  Takehiko Nohmi
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2018-10-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.