Literature DB >> 8574068

In vitro fertilization: a cost-effective alternative for infertile couples?

F S Trad1, M D Hornstein, R L Barbieri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost of in vitro fertilization by calculating the cost of a live birth using this technology and determine cost variation according to the clinical characteristics of a particular population.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of infertile couples who presented for their first IVF cycle in 1993. A fraction of the total population was assigned to three groups A, B, and C with high, intermediate and low probability of pregnancy respectively and their reproductive performance was evaluated until September 1994 or a maximum of three IVF cycles have been completed.
SETTING: The in vitro fertilization program at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston. PATIENTS: 182 couples who presented for their first IVF cycle in 1993. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The cost of a successful pregnancy using IVF in the three groups and in the general population was calculated by dividing the average cost of an IVF cycle by the fraction of the cycles resulting in a successful pregnancy.
RESULTS: The cost of a successful pregnancy in group A, B and C ranged from $22,857 to $42,666 after 1 cycle and from $26,800 to $74,666 after 3 IVF cycles. The average cost for the 182 patients was $29,120 after 1 cycle and $31,590 after a maximum of 3 IVF cycles.
CONCLUSION: The cost of a successful pregnancy: (1) was comparable to other options available to an infertile couple such as adoption and tubal surgery, (2) was 50% to 70% cheaper in the group with a highest probability of pregnancy when compared to the group with the lowest probability of pregnancy, and (3) did not vary significantly after 1 or 3 IVF cycles in most groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brigham and Women's Hospital; Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8574068     DOI: 10.1007/bf02211141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  12 in total

1.  Costs in relation to effects of in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  G Haan; R van Steen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  A satellite system for assisted reproductive technologies: an evaluation.

Authors:  L M Talbert; M Hammond; L Bailey; R Wing
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Terminal tuboplasties by laparoscopy: 65 consecutive cases.

Authors:  J B Dubuisson; J Bouquet de Jolinière; F X Aubriot; E Daraï; H Foulot; L Mandelbrot
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Simplification of IVF: minimal monitoring and the use of subcutaneous highly purified FSH administration for ovulation induction.

Authors:  M Wikland; J Borg; L Hamberger; P Svalander
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Programming in vitro fertilization for a 5- or 3-day week.

Authors:  E S Dimitry; S A Bates; T Oskarsson; R Margara; R M Winston
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  The willingness to pay for in vitro fertilization: a pilot study using contingent valuation.

Authors:  P J Neumann; M Johannesson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  The cost of a successful delivery with in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  P J Neumann; S D Gharib; M C Weinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1992 results generated from the American Fertility Society/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Ovulation induction with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination compared with in vitro fertilization and no therapy: a prospective, nonrandomized, cohort study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C M Peterson; H H Hatasaka; K P Jones; A M Poulson; D T Carrell; R L Urry
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure.

Authors:  R M Winston; R A Margara
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-07
View more
  3 in total

1.  Reflections on the cost-effectiveness of recombinant FSH in assisted reproduction. The clinician's perspective.

Authors:  J Balasch; P N Barri
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The combined effect of age and basal follicle-stimulating hormone on the cost of a live birth at assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Melinda B Henne; Barbara J Stegmann; Adrienne B Neithardt; William H Catherino; Alicia Y Armstrong; Tzu-Cheg Kao; James H Segars
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Quantifying the biomechanics of conception: L-selectin-mediated blastocyst implantation mechanics with engineered "trophospheres".

Authors:  Robert W Yucha; Monika Jost; Dianne Rothstein; Noreen Robertson; Michele S Marcolongo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 3.845

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.