Literature DB >> 8573700

Magnetic field effects on biomolecules, cells, and living organisms.

F T Hong1.   

Abstract

This article surveys three major areas of biomagnetic research: (a) the magneto-orientation effect; (b) the role of the geomagnetic field in bird orientation and navigation; and (c) the biological effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields. The magneto-orientation effect is caused by diamagnetic anisotropy of highly ordered biological structures, such as visual photoreceptor and chloroplast membranes, in a homogeneous magnetic field of about 10 kG. While it is not possible to orient the individual constituent molecules with such a field because of thermal fluctuation, these ordered structures can be oriented as a whole by virtue of summing the anisotropy over a large number of mutually oriented molecules. While the magneto-orientation effect seems to require the use of unphysiologically strong magnetic fields, certain birds apparently have highly sensitive sensors to detect the geomagnetic field for the purpose of orientation and navigation. However, the advances in this latter field were made mainly in the behavioral studies; the magneto-sensors the the neural mechanisms remain elusive. A number of candidates of the sensors are evaluated. We suggest that pecten oculi, which is unique to avian eyes, should not be overlooked for its possible role as a magneto-sensor based on the magneto-orientation effect. Birds primarily use a static (DC) magnetic field for orientation, but recent investigations indicate that weak alternating (AC) magnetic fields with extremely low frequency (ELF) may have hazardous health effects. Such reports are often received with skepticism, because the effects usually involve magnetic energies that are less than the kT energy. However, some of the in vitro studies yield experimental results that are too significant to be ignored. Here, we propose an argument to explain why low-level magnetic fields can be detected without being overshadowed by thermal noises. Relevance of biomagnetic research to the development of biosensors and novel computational paradigms is also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8573700     DOI: 10.1016/0303-2647(95)01555-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosystems        ISSN: 0303-2647            Impact factor:   1.973


  12 in total

1.  A model for photoreceptor-based magnetoreception in birds.

Authors:  T Ritz; S Adem; K Schulten
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  The heat shock-induced cell cycle arrest is attenuated by weak electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Sergey V Tokalov; Herwig O Gutzeit
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.831

3.  Signal transduction across alamethicin ion channels in the presence of noise.

Authors:  S M Bezrukov; I Vodyanoy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  T2*-based fiber orientation mapping.

Authors:  Jongho Lee; Peter van Gelderen; Li-Wei Kuo; Hellmut Merkle; Afonso C Silva; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The effects of rotating magnetic field and antiseptic on in vitro pathogenic biofilm and its milieu.

Authors:  Daria Ciecholewska-Juśko; Anna Żywicka; Adam Junka; Marta Woroszyło; Marcin Wardach; Grzegorz Chodaczek; Patrycja Szymczyk-Ziółkowska; Paweł Migdał; Karol Fijałkowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Toward 20 T magnetic resonance for human brain studies: opportunities for discovery and neuroscience rationale.

Authors:  Thomas F Budinger; Mark D Bird; Lucio Frydman; Joanna R Long; Thomas H Mareci; William D Rooney; Bruce Rosen; John F Schenck; Victor D Schepkin; A Dean Sherry; Daniel K Sodickson; Charles S Springer; Keith R Thulborn; Kamil Uğurbil; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Aligning Paramecium caudatum with static magnetic fields.

Authors:  Karine Guevorkian; James M Valles
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields and Redox-Responsive Pathways Linked to Cancer Drug Resistance: Insights from Co-Exposure-Based In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Stefano Falone; Silvano Santini; Valeria Cordone; Giovanna Di Emidio; Carla Tatone; Marisa Cacchio; Fernanda Amicarelli
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-02-23

9.  Exposure to static magnetic field stimulates quorum sensing circuit in luminescent Vibrio strains of the Harveyi clade.

Authors:  Adelfia Talà; Domenico Delle Side; Giovanni Buccolieri; Salvatore Maurizio Tredici; Luciano Velardi; Fabio Paladini; Mario De Stefano; Vincenzo Nassisi; Pietro Alifano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Physical forces modulate cell differentiation and proliferation processes.

Authors:  Laurent Schwartz; Jorgelindo da Veiga Moreira; Mario Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 5.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.