Literature DB >> 857303

Ability of spirometry, flow-volume curves and the nitrogen closing volume test to detect smokers. A population study.

H Oxhoj, B Bake, L Wilhelmsen.   

Abstract

Vital capacity, FEV1 and various measurements of forced expiratory flows as well as closing volume (CV), closing capacity (CC), the mean slope of the alveolar plateau (phase III), the maximal amplitude of the cardiogenic oscillations (N2-osc), and other variables obtained from the nitrogen CV-test were measured in random samples of 50- (n = 221) and 60-year-old (n - 410) men in Gothenburg. All the variables were significantly different in smokers consuming 15 g or more tobacco daily compared with asymptomatic non-smokers. Reference values were established from measurements in the non-smokers without respiratory symptoms, and the sensitivities of the measured variables to tobacco smoking were assessed. Phase III revealed the highest sensitivity, being abnormal in about 40-60 % of subjects smoking 15 g or more tobacco daily and in about 30-35 % of subjects smoking less. CV and FEV1 were approximately equally sensitive, being abnormal in about 10-30 % of subjects smoking 15 g or more daily and in about 5-20 % in subjects smoking less. Other measurements of maximal expiratory flow rates gave values below minus two standard deviations for the appropriate reference group in less than 15 % of the smokers. However, when we took the skewed distribution of reference values into account we found a two- to sixfold increase of the sensitivities of these variables in the 50-year-old smokers, in which abnormal values were obtained in about 30-40 % of subjects smoking 15 g or more daily and in about 10-15 % in subjects smoking less. Taking all variables obtained from the CV-test in conjunction, one or more abnormal valves were obtained in 60-70 % of the subjects smoking 15 g or more daily. To the extent that sensitivity to smoking reflects sensitivity to abnormalities in small airways, phase III appeared to be the most efficient single measurement for detection of this condition in the present age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 857303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Respir Dis        ISSN: 0036-5572


  7 in total

1.  Predictive value of the single-breath nitrogen test for hospitalization due to respiratory disease.

Authors:  J Vestbo; K M Knudsen; F V Rasmussen
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  Definitions of emphysema, chronic bronchitis, asthma, and airflow obstruction: 25 years on from the Ciba symposium.

Authors:  C M Fletcher; N B Pride
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Pulmonary function after long-term exposure to trichlorophenol.

Authors:  R Alexandersson; G Hedenstierna
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Prediction of BOS by the single-breath nitrogen test in double lung transplant recipients.

Authors:  Gerdt C Riise; Gunnar Mårtensson; Birgitta Houltz; Björn Bake
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-11-26

Review 5.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with mild airflow limitation: current knowledge and proposal for future research - a consensus document from six scientific societies.

Authors:  Andrea Rossi; Bojana Butorac-Petanjek; Marco Chilosi; Borja G Cosío; Matjaz Flezar; Nikolaos Koulouris; José Marin; Neven Miculinic; Guido Polese; Miroslav Samaržija; Sabina Skrgat; Theodoros Vassilakopoulos; Andrea Vukić-Dugac; Spyridon Zakynthinos; Marc Miravitlles
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2017-08-29

6.  Small airway function measured using forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity and its relationship to airflow limitation in symptomatic ever-smokers: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nowaf Y Alobaidi; Mohammed Almeshari; James Stockley; Robert Andrew Stockley; Elizabeth Sapey
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2022-10

7.  Respiratory symptoms and peripheral airways disease in a cross-sectional study on a random population sample.

Authors:  Jan Yngve Olofson; Birgitta Houltz; Maria Nilsson Tengelin; Björn Bake
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.