BACKGROUND: University of Wisconsin solution (UW) is in limited clinical use for heart transplantation, but there are doubts about its efficacy and concerns about the effect of its high K+ concentration on endothelium. St. Thomas' solution with or without aspartate is widely used and is of proven efficacy. METHODS: Using a modified (starch-free) variant of UW (MUW) we studied: (1) recovery of function with UW compared with aspartate-containing St. Thomas' solution; (2) effect of elevation of K+ in St. Thomas' solution to the level in UW; and (3) effect of reduction of K+ in UW and addition of Ca2+ or aspartate. Isolated rat hearts underwent 7 hours of arrest at 1 degrees C using MUW with or without 20 mmol/L aspartate or using aspartate-containing St. Thomas' solution. RESULTS: Functional recovery with MUW (51.8% +/- 2.5%) was superior to that with aspartate-containing St. Thomas' solution (37.1% +/- 4.3%; p < 0.01). Addition of aspartate to MUW had no effect. During 6 hours of arrest, lowering the K+ in MUW from 125 mmol/L to 20 mmol/L reduced functional recovery from 59.9% +/- 4.2% to 42.3% +/- 4.3% (p < 0.01). The addition of 1 mmol/L Ca2+ had no effect. Elevation of K+ in St. Thomas' solution produced more rapid arrest but no improvement in recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The protective effect of starch-free UW is greater (+13%) than that of aspartate-enriched St. Thomas' solution. Reduction of K+ in UW to lessen possible deleterious effects would decrease its protective effect by about 30% to a level comparable with that of St. Thomas' solution.
BACKGROUND: University of Wisconsin solution (UW) is in limited clinical use for heart transplantation, but there are doubts about its efficacy and concerns about the effect of its high K+ concentration on endothelium. St. Thomas' solution with or without aspartate is widely used and is of proven efficacy. METHODS: Using a modified (starch-free) variant of UW (MUW) we studied: (1) recovery of function with UW compared with aspartate-containing St. Thomas' solution; (2) effect of elevation of K+ in St. Thomas' solution to the level in UW; and (3) effect of reduction of K+ in UW and addition of Ca2+ or aspartate. Isolated rat hearts underwent 7 hours of arrest at 1 degrees C using MUW with or without 20 mmol/L aspartate or using aspartate-containing St. Thomas' solution. RESULTS: Functional recovery with MUW (51.8% +/- 2.5%) was superior to that with aspartate-containing St. Thomas' solution (37.1% +/- 4.3%; p < 0.01). Addition of aspartate to MUW had no effect. During 6 hours of arrest, lowering the K+ in MUW from 125 mmol/L to 20 mmol/L reduced functional recovery from 59.9% +/- 4.2% to 42.3% +/- 4.3% (p < 0.01). The addition of 1 mmol/L Ca2+ had no effect. Elevation of K+ in St. Thomas' solution produced more rapid arrest but no improvement in recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The protective effect of starch-free UW is greater (+13%) than that of aspartate-enriched St. Thomas' solution. Reduction of K+ in UW to lessen possible deleterious effects would decrease its protective effect by about 30% to a level comparable with that of St. Thomas' solution.