Literature DB >> 8568333

Digestive and nutritional consequences of pancreatic resections. The classical vs the pylorus-sparing procedure.

F Crucitti1, G Doglietto, R Bellantone, G A Miggiano, D Frontera, A M Ferrante, A Castelli.   

Abstract

Digestive and nutritional alterations are a common occurrence after pancreatic resections. The authors report the results of a multiparametric evaluation performed in a group of 26 patients submitted to total or cephalic pancreatectomy. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedure; group A (n = 13) included gastroresected patients and group B (n = 13) included those submitted to pylorus-sparing pancreatic resection. Subclinical digestive and absorptive impairment has been found in 61.5% of group A patients; the nutritional status was clinically poor in four cases from the same group. Digestive alterations have also been found in 69.2% of group B cases, but nutritional status was always satisfactory in the whole group. The more positive results obtained with the pylorus-sparing technique encourage wider adoption of this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8568333     DOI: 10.1007/BF02788357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pancreatol        ISSN: 0169-4197


  28 in total

1.  Non-preservation of the pylorus in resection of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  E J Boerma; J A Coosemans
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Pylorus-preserving pancreatectomy: functional results.

Authors:  D R Hunt; R McLean
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  A prospective study of the immediate and long-term results of polya gastrectomy for duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  K C McKeown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Digestive function after radical pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  J C Fish; L B Smith; R D Williams
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Twenty-five years after Billroth II gastrectomy for duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  A B Fischer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Pyloric and gastric preservation with pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  K D Newman; J W Braasch; R L Rossi; S O'Campo-Gonzales
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Instant nutritional assessment: absolute weight loss and surgical mortality.

Authors:  M H Seltzer; B A Slocum; E L Cataldi-Betcher; C Fileti; N Gerson
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Preservation of the pylorus in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  L W Traverso; W P Longmire
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1978-06

9.  Postoperative evaluation of the exocrine function of the pancreas after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  K Mori; A Misumi; M Sugiyama; Y Sakamoto; J Ishii; T Kaneko; M Akagi
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1979-01

Review 10.  Cancer of the ampulla of vater, bile duct, and duodenum.

Authors:  A M Cooperman
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 2.741

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Survival, mortality and quality of life after pylorus-preserving or classical Whipple operation. A systematic review with meta-analysis].

Authors:  C Fitzmaurice; C M Seiler; M W Büchler; M K Diener
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: biology, diagnosis,and treatment.

Authors:  Cynthia Ro; Wanxing Chai; Victoria E Yu; Run Yu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2012-12-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.