Literature DB >> 8567802

Should donors have the right to decide who receives their gametes?

G Pennings1.   

Abstract

A continuing feature of gamete donation is the scarcity of available donors. A strategy to improve the meagre supply of gametes would be to adjust the donation procedure to the wishes and desires of the donors. However, giving donors the right to direct their gametes to certain groups of recipients goes against the general rule that donors relinquish all rights and duties. Moreover, allocation by the donor might very well run counter to the rules of distributional justice. On the other hand, the allocation right can be supported by the principle of autonomy and by the donor's interest in and contribution to the process. The position is taken that the donors should have the right to direct their gametes to categories accepted as relevant by the moral and religious communities in their society. They should not be given the right to add their own categories to the exclusion list. If donors are not allowed to allocate their gift, they should at least be informed as to which categories of recipient are treated by the hospital to enable them to decide whether they want to donate gametes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8567802     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  4 in total

1.  The reduction of sperm donor candidates due to the abolition of the anonymity rule: analysis of an argument.

Authors:  P Guido
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The current status of sperm donation in assisted reproduction technology: ethical and legal considerations.

Authors:  D Meirow; J G Schenker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  One and done? Equality of opportunity and repeated access to scarce, indivisible medical resources.

Authors:  Marco D Huesch
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Online sperm donation: a survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website.

Authors:  T Freeman; V Jadva; E Tranfield; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 6.918

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.