Literature DB >> 8567252

Spinal fusion induced by porous hydroxyapatite blocks (HA). Experimental comparative study with HA, demineralized bone matrix and autogenous bone marrow.

P Ragni1, P Ala-Mononen, T S Lindholm.   

Abstract

Numerous materials have been studied and recently used in clinical practice as synthetic bone biosubstitutes to integrate or even replace autogenous bone grafts. This study consisted of an experimental vertebral fusion model in rabbits using porous hydroxyapatite (HA), both alone and in various combinations with demineralized bone matrix (DBM), as a vehicle for the osteoinductive agent (Bone Morphogenetic Protein-BMP), and with autogenous bone marrow (BM), which supplies BMP-sensitive reticular cells. The animals were divided into two main groups on the basis of the physical form of the biomaterial implanted: HA blocks and HA granules, which in turn included several subgroups based on the composition of the implants (HA, HA+DBM, HA+BM, HA+DBM+BM). There were also control groups with no implant or with bone autografts (ACB). Two months after the operation, analysis of the results (radiograph, fusion stability test on dynamic radiographs, histological evaluation) demonstrated the following: clinical and radiographical results of the group implanted with HA blocks were superimposable on those with autogenous bone grafts, especially in the subgroup treated with DBM and BM, while in the group implanted with granules the results were poor, thus indicating the fundamental influence of the physical state of the biomaterial on bone ingrowth. This was then further confirmed by the histological study in the HA block group, whereas the HA granule group showed a certain fibrous reaction around the granules with poor porous bone ingrowth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8567252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital J Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0390-5489


  4 in total

1.  Demineralized bone matrix and hydroxyapatite/tri-calcium phosphate mixture for bone healing in rats.

Authors:  Ali Oztürk; H Yetkin; L Memis; E Cila; S Bolukbasi; Halil Can Gemalmaz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Effectiveness of Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion Varies with the Physical Properties of Demineralized Bone Matrix Strip.

Authors:  Yong-Soo Choi; Dae-Hee Kim; Ji-Hun Park; Brian Johnstone; Jung-U Yoo
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-06-08

3.  Subchondral bone regenerative effect of two different biomaterials in the same patient.

Authors:  Marco Cavallo; Roberto Buda; Francesca Vannini; Francesco Castagnini; Alberto Ruffilli; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2013-07-07

Review 4.  Understanding the Future Prospects of Synergizing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery with Ceramics and Regenerative Cellular Therapies.

Authors:  Wen-Cheng Lo; Lung-Wen Tsai; Yi-Shan Yang; Ryan Wing Yuk Chan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.