Literature DB >> 8566842

Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

J J Bergman1, G R van den Brink, E A Rauws, L de Wit, H Obertop, K Huibregtse, G N Tytgat, D J Gouma.   

Abstract

From January 1990 to June 1994, 53 patients who sustained bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy were treated at the Amsterdam Academic Medical Centre. There were 16 men and 37 women with a mean age of 47 years. Follow up was established in all patients for a median of 17 months. Four types of ductal injury were identified. Type A (18 patients) had leakage from cystic ducts or peripheral hepatic radicles, type B (11 patients) had major bile duct leakage, type C (nine patients) had an isolated ductal stricture, and type D (15 patients) had complete transection of the bile duct. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) established the diagnosis in all type A, B, and C lesions. In type D lesions percutaneous cholangiography was required to delineate the proximal extent of the injury. Initial treatment (until resolution of symptoms and discharge from hospital) comprised endoscopy in 36 patients and surgery in 26 patients. Endoscopic treatment was possible and successful in 16 of 18 of type A lesions, five of seven of type B lesions, and three of nine of type C lesions. Most failures resulted from inability to pass strictures or leaks at the initial endoscopy. During initial treatment additional surgery was required in seven patients. Fourteen patients underwent percutaneous or surgical drainage of bile collections, or both. After endoscopic treatment early complications occurred in three patients, with a fatal outcome in two (not related to the endoscopic therapy). During follow up six patients developed late complications. All 15 patients with complete transection and four patients with major bile duct leakage were initially treated surgically. During initial treatment additional endoscopy was required in two patients. Early complications occurred in eight patients. During follow up seven patients developed stenosis of the anastomosis or bile duct. Reconstructive surgery in the early postoperative phase was associated with more complications than elective reconstructive surgery. Most type A and B bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (80%) can be treated endoscopically. In patients with more severe ductal injury (type C and D) reconstructive surgery is eventually required in 70%. Multidisciplinary approach to these lesions is advocated and algorithms for treatment are proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8566842      PMCID: PMC1382993          DOI: 10.1136/gut.38.1.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  24 in total

1.  Laparoscopic bile duct injuries. Risk factors, recognition, and repair.

Authors:  R L Rossi; W J Schirmer; J W Braasch; L B Sanders; J L Munson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-05

2.  Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Diagnostic and therapeutic application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  R Kozarek; R Gannan; R Baerg; J Wagonfeld; T Ball
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-05

Review 3.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.

Authors:  P B Cotton; G Lehman; J Vennes; J E Geenen; R C Russell; W C Meyers; C Liguory; N Nickl
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; F Dubois; J Mouiel; P Mouret; H Becker; G Buess; M Trede; H Troidl
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Endoscopic stent placement for cystic duct leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R A Kozarek; L W Traverso
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  The role of interventional radiology for complications of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E vanSonnenberg; G Casola; G R Wittich; R Christensen; R R Varney; C C Neff; H B D'Agostino; A R Moossa
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Follow-up 6 to 11 years after duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for stones in patients with prior cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R H Hawes; P B Cotton; A G Vallon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Bile ascites.

Authors:  E F Rosato; H D Berkowitz; B Roberts
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1970-03

9.  Endoscopic treatment of biliary injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R A Kozarek; T J Ball; D J Patterson; J J Brandabur; S Raltz; L W Traverso
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Davidoff; T N Pappas; E A Murray; D J Hilleren; R D Johnson; M E Baker; G E Newman; P B Cotton; W C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  65 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in routine practice: duct injury as an index event.

Authors:  T F Gorey; P Papasavas
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Bile duct injury: new aspects of diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  D J Gouma
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-08

3.  Repair of bile duct injuries with Gore-Tex vascular grafts: experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  Néstor A Gómez; Ludwig R Alvarez; Alfredo Mite; Jean P Andrade; José R Alvarez; Paola E Vargas; Nancy E Tomalá; Alex F Vivas; Jorge A Zapatier
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life.

Authors:  Genevieve B Melton; Keith D Lillemoe; John L Cameron; Patricia A Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Iatrogenic bile duct injuries.

Authors:  P R Savassi-Rocha; S R Almeida; M D Sanches; M A C Andrade; J T Frerreira; M T C Diniz; A L S Rocha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?

Authors:  F Ausania; L R Holmes; F Ausania; S Iype; P Ricci; S A White
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Role of symptoms, trend of liver tests, and endotherapy in management of post-cholecystectomy biliary leak.

Authors:  P Cantù; A Tenca; C Caparello; A Grigolon; L Piodi; I Bravi; E Contessini Avesani; D Conte; R Penagini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Current management of biliary strictures.

Authors:  Jennifer G Hall; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Referral pattern and timing of repair are risk factors for complications after reconstructive surgery for bile duct injury.

Authors:  Philip R de Reuver; Irene Grossmann; Olivier R Busch; Huug Obertop; Thomas M van Gulik; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Endoscopic therapy of benign biliary strictures.

Authors:  Joel R Judah; Peter V Draganov
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.