Literature DB >> 8566751

Rescue of Drosophila labial null mutant by the chicken ortholog Hoxb-1 demonstrates that the function of Hox genes is phylogenetically conserved.

B Lutz1, H C Lu, G Eichele, D Miller, T C Kaufman.   

Abstract

Hox complexes are important players in the establishment of the body plan of invertebrates and vertebrates. Sequence comparison demonstrates a remarkable phylogenetic conservation of key structural features of Hox genes. The correlation between the physical order of genes along the chromosomes and their domains of function along the body axis is conserved between arthropods and vertebrates. Ectopic expression experiments suggest that the functions of homeo proteins also are conserved between invertebrates and vertebrates. However, it remains an open question whether vertebrate Hox genes expressed under the control of Drosophila regulatory sequences can substitute the function of Drosophila Hox genes. We have studied this issue with the Drosophila labial (lab) gene and its chicken ortholog gHoxb-1. We fused the entire protein-coding region of gHoxb-1 with previously identified regulatory sequences of lab. This approach places gHoxb-1 into the normal embryonic spatiotemporal context in which lab acts. Ten transgenic lines carrying gHoxb-1 were established and tested for their ability to rescue lab null mutant animals. Eight lines rescued with high efficiency, embryonic lethality, and abnormal head morphogenesis, two defects observed in lab null mutant embryos. The rescue with the gHoxb-1 minigene was close to the efficiency of that obtained with the Drosophila lab minigene. This indicates that gHoxb-1 protein can regulate lab target genes and thereby restore embryonic viability. This is striking, as Lab and gHoxb-1 proteins are divergent except for their homeo domains and a short stretch of amino acids amino-terminal to the homeo domain. Our findings demonstrate a functional conservation of the lab class homeo proteins between insects and vertebrates and support the view that function of Hox genes resides in relatively few conserved motifs and largely in the homeo domain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8566751     DOI: 10.1101/gad.10.2.176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  23 in total

1.  Isolation and characterization of mammalian homologs of the Drosophila gene glial cells missing.

Authors:  J Kim; B W Jones; C Zock; Z Chen; H Wang; C S Goodman; D J Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Transcriptional regulators and the evolution of plant form.

Authors:  J Doebley; L Lukens
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Hox and a newly identified E2F co-repress cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Jennifer Winn; Monique Carter; Leon Avery; Scott Cameron
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Modification of expression and cis-regulation of Hoxc8 in the evolution of diverged axial morphology.

Authors:  H G Belting; C S Shashikant; F H Ruddle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparing anterior and posterior Hox complex formation reveals guidelines for predicting cis-regulatory elements.

Authors:  Juli D Uhl; Tiffany A Cook; Brian Gebelein
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Non-specificity of transcription factor function in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Anthony Percival-Smith
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 7.  The fates of zebrafish Hox gene duplicates.

Authors:  Chris Jozefowicz; James McClintock; Victoria Prince
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

8.  Null mutations in human and mouse orthologs frequently result in different phenotypes.

Authors:  Ben-Yang Liao; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Improving Hox protein classification across the major model organisms.

Authors:  Stefanie D Hueber; Georg F Weiller; Michael A Djordjevic; Tancred Frickey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ontogeny and phylogeny: molecular signatures of selection, constraint, and temporal pleiotropy in the development of Drosophila.

Authors:  Carlo G Artieri; Wilfried Haerty; Rama S Singh
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.