Literature DB >> 8564902

Do consensus conferences influence their participants?

A M Clarfield1, S Kogan, H Bergman, D E Shapiro, M P Beaudet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether participation in a consensus conference on the assessment of dementia would influence conference participants with respect to their recommendations to primary care physicians for the assessment of dementia.
DESIGN: Questionnaire before and after the conference.
SETTING: Canadian Consensus Conference on the Assessment of Dementia, held in Montreal, Oct. 5 and 6, 1989. PARTICIPANTS: All 38 experts representing relevant health disciplines who participated in the consensus conference; 36 completed both questionnaires. OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants' opinion before and after the conference as to how frequently each of 28 manoeuvres (12 blood tests, 4 neurologic imaging procedures, 4 types of consultation and 8 "other" tests) should be ordered by primary care physicians as part of an assessment of a patient with dementia suspected in clinical grounds.
RESULTS: For 18 (64%) of the 28 manoeuvres (10 of the 12 blood tests, 3 of the 4 neurologic imaging procedures and 5 of the 8 "other" tests), there was a shift in opinion after the conference toward recommending that primary care physicians order them less often; for 10 of these 18 (5 blood tests and 5 "other" tests) the shift was statistically significant. For the remaining 10 manoeuvres (36%) the shift in opinion was toward a recommendation that primary care physicians order them more often; the shift was not statistically significant for any of these 10 manoeuvres.
CONCLUSION: Expert members of a consensus conference are influenced by the process of having participated in such a conference and are capable and willing to chance their initial recommendations when confronted with relevant data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8564902      PMCID: PMC1487514     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  15 in total

1.  Standards, guidelines and clinical policies.

Authors:  A M Clarfield
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Should a major imaging procedure (CT or MRI) be required in the workup of dementia? An affirmative view.

Authors:  R Katzman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 3.  Should a major imaging procedure (CT or MRI) be required in the workup of dementia? An opposing view.

Authors:  A M Clarfield; E B Larson
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Diagnosing and treating dementia.

Authors:  R Ramsay; C L Katona
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-01-07

5.  Do consensus conferences work? A process evaluation of the NIH Consensus Development Program.

Authors:  P M Wortman; A Vinokur; L Sechrest
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.265

6.  Awareness, use, and impact of the 1984 Joint National Committee consensus report on high blood pressure.

Authors:  M N Hill; D M Levine; P K Whelton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Initiating, conducting and maintaining guidelines development programs.

Authors:  R S Hayward; A Laupacis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Clinical practice guidelines: between science and art.

Authors:  R N Battista; M J Hodge
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  The American and Canadian consensus conferences on dementia: is there consensus?

Authors:  A M Clarfield; J M Foley
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice.

Authors:  J Kosecoff; D E Kanouse; W H Rogers; L McCloskey; C M Winslow; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, 1999. Canadian Asthma Consensus Group.

Authors:  L P Boulet; A Becker; D Bérubé; R Beveridge; P Ernst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-11-30       Impact factor: 8.262

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.