Literature DB >> 8561239

Violence and injury in marital arguments: risk patterns and gender differences.

S B Sorenson1, D M Upchurch, H Shen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Community-based research on violence against women typically focuses on marital arguments rather than on resulting injuries. This study investigated patterns of victimization, violence perpetration, and injury in marital arguments.
METHODS: Data from the National Survey on Families and Households and binomial and multinomial logit models were used to analyze characteristics of those who experienced physical violence, as well as to determine who was the perpetrator and who was the victim.
RESULTS: Men and women reported similar behaviors during verbal arguments. Young persons, urban dwellers, the less educated, those with low incomes, and Blacks were more likely to report that there had been physical violence in their marriages in the past year. Ethnicity, income, education, and number and age of children at home were not associated consistently with injury of the wife, the husband, or both.
CONCLUSIONS: Persons who report physical violence in their marriage are very similar to those who are at increased risk of interpersonal violence in general. The co-occurrence of street and other nonfamily violence with spousal violence may be a fruitful area for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8561239      PMCID: PMC1380357          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.86.1.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  10 in total

1.  A population-based study of injuries in inner-city women.

Authors:  J A Grisso; A R Wishner; D F Schwarz; B A Weene; J H Holmes; R L Sutton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Self-reports of spousal violence in a Mexican-American and non-Hispanic white population.

Authors:  S B Sorenson; C A Telles
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  1991

3.  The scope of rape: incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students.

Authors:  M P Koss; C A Gidycz; N Wisniewski
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1987-04

4.  Mental health correlates of criminal victimization: a random community survey.

Authors:  D G Kilpatrick; C L Best; L J Veronen; A E Amick; L A Villeponteaux; G A Ruff
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1985-12

5.  Men, women, and murder: gender-specific differences in rates of fatal violence and victimization.

Authors:  A L Kellermann; J A Mercy
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1992-07

6.  The prevalence of adult sexual assault. The Los Angeles Epidemiologic Catchment Area Project.

Authors:  S B Sorenson; J A Stein; J M Siegel; J M Golding; M A Burnam
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Marital stability throughout the child-rearing years.

Authors:  T B Heaton
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1990-02

8.  Courtship violence: incidence in a national sample of higher education students.

Authors:  J W White; M P Koss
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  1991

9.  Medicine and patriarchal violence: the social construction of a "private" event.

Authors:  E Stark; A Flitcraft; W Frazier
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.663

10.  Women and violence: victims and perpetrators.

Authors:  S K Steinmetz
Journal:  Am J Psychother       Date:  1980-07
  10 in total
  47 in total

1.  Partner violence among adolescents in opposite-sex romantic relationships: findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.

Authors:  C T Halpern; S G Oslak; M L Young; S L Martin; L L Kupper
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Fluency in the consulting room.

Authors:  Nasreen Ali
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Screening for domestic violence in general practice: a way forward?

Authors:  Felicity Goodyear-Smith; Bruce Arroll
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Why are cohabiting relationships more violent than marriages?.

Authors:  Catherine T Kenney; Sara S McLanahan
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2006-02

5.  Social information processing mediates the intergenerational transmission of aggressiveness in romantic relationships.

Authors:  Jennifer E Fite; John E Bates; Amy Holtzworth-Munroe; Kenneth A Dodge; Sandra Y Nay; Gregory S Pettit
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2008-06

6.  Contributions of work stressors, alcohol, and normative beliefs to partner violence.

Authors:  Genevieve M Ames; Carol B Cunradi; Michael Duke; Michael Todd; Meng-Jinn Chen
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.582

7.  Phenomenology of borderline personality disorder: the role of race and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Natacha M De Genna; Ulrike Feske
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.254

8.  Intimate Partner Violence among California Couples: Multilevel Analysis of Environmental and Partner Risk Factors.

Authors:  Carol B Cunradi; Michael Todd; Christina Mair; Lillian Remer
Journal:  Partner Abuse       Date:  2013-10-01

9.  Marriageable Women: A Focus on Participants in a Community Healthy Marriage Program.

Authors:  Wendy D Manning; Deanna Trella; Heidi Lyons; Nola Cora Du Toit
Journal:  Fam Relat       Date:  2010-03-20

10.  Drinking context and intimate partner violence: evidence from the California community health study of couples.

Authors:  Carol B Cunradi; Christina Mair; Michael Todd; Lillian Remer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.