Literature DB >> 8561144

The effect of posture on gastroesophageal reflux event frequency and composition during fasting.

S S Shay1, D L Conwell, V Mehindru, B Hertz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of three postures (upright and left and right recumbent) on gastroesophageal reflux event (RE) frequency and composition and a possible mechanism for the observations.
METHODS: A) Forty fasting patients with (E+, n = 20) and without (E-, n =20) esophagitis were studied. Simultaneous manometry and pH monitoring were conducted in the left and right recumbent (10 min each) as well as the upright posture (20 min). RE were classified by the pH probe and/or the manometry catheter as acid or gas RE. B) In 23 patients referred for UGI series, radiographs were taken in the left and right recumbent and upright postures after barium and Fizzies.
RESULTS: A) Upright RE were similar in frequency in E+ and E- patients (2.6 +/- 0.5 vs 3.05 +/- 0.6). However, E+ patients had more recumbent RE (16.3 +/- 3 vs 0.65 +/- 0.2, p = 0.0001) than E- patients; moreover, the left recumbent posture had more recumbent RE than the right (10.9 +/- 2 vs 5.3 +/- 1, p < 0.02). Moving from recumbent to the upright posture had an opposite effect on RE in the two groups; RE decreased sixfold in E+ patients (16.3 +/- 3 vs 2.6 +/- 0.5, p = 0.0001) but increased fourfold in E- patients (0.65 +/- 0.2 vs 3.05 +/- 0.6, p = 0.0001). In examining RE composition in the E+ patients, RE were twofold more likely to be gas in the left recumbent posture (7.6 +/- 2 vs 3.3 +/- 1, p < 0.1); in direct contrast, RE were eightfold more likely to be acid in the right recumbent posture (4.7 +/- 1 vs 0.6 +/- 0.5, p = 0.0001). As expected from this observation, acid exposure was greater in the right than left posture (52 +/- 8 vs 15 +/- 6%, p < 0.0001). Although RE were too infrequent in E- patients to reach statistical significance, the effect of posture on the composition of the few RE that did occur mirrored that of the E+ patients. B) In 17/23 (74%) radiographs in the right recumbent posture, the EG junction was submerged in a barium pool below the air-barium interface in the stomach. In contrast, this occurred in 0/23 patients in the left recumbent and 1/23 patients in the upright postures because the EG junction was in the air above the barium pool.
CONCLUSION: Posture has an influence on RE frequency and composition while fasting, and the latter is likely due to whether the EG junction is submerged below liquid gastric contents or in the air above the liquid gastric contents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8561144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  8 in total

1.  An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management--the Genval Workshop Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Endoscopic and manometric position-related characteristics of the normal gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Gordon Buduhan; Jeraldine Orlina; Brian Louie; Eric Vallieres; Ralph Aye
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  CPAP-induced aerophagia may precipitate gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Kelly Shepherd; David Hillman; Peter Eastwood
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 4.  Lifestyle measures in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: clinical and pathophysiological considerations.

Authors:  J H-E Kang; J Y Kang
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Prolonged measurement of lower oesophageal sphincter function in patients with intestinal metaplasia at the oesophagogastric junction.

Authors:  C Wolf; R Timmer; R Breumelhof; C A Seldenrijk; A J Smout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Origin of atypical reflux symptoms. A case study showing the importance of reflux composition and posture.

Authors:  S S Shay; J E Richter
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux revisited by impedance-pH monitoring.

Authors:  Fernando Fornari; Kathleen Blondeau; Veerle Mertens; Jan Tack; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 4.924

8.  The Influences of Visceral Fat Area on the Sites of Esophageal Mucosal Breaks in Subjects with Gastroesophageal Reflux Diseases.

Authors:  Ji Hyung Nam; Eirie Cho; Jeung Sook Kim; Eun-Cheol Park; Jae Hak Kim
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2019-02-17       Impact factor: 2.260

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.