OBJECTIVES: The clinical significance of preoperative serum levels of tumor markers CEA and CA19-9 was evaluated in gastric cancer patients. METHODS: Serum levels of CEA and CA19-9 were measured in 663 patients with gastric cancer who underwent laparotomies over a recent 4-yr period (1990-1993). The correlations between the serum levels of tumor markers and several clinicopathological factors were evaluated by univariate analysis. The significance of the tumor markers as prognostic factors was assessed by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The positivity rates of CEA and CA19-9 were 16.6% and 16.0%, respectively. The positivity of CEA correlated well with the sex of the patients, hepatic, peritoneal, and nodal metastases and the depths of tumors, but it correlated weakly with a tumor's histological type. The positivity of CA19-9 correlated well with various forms of metastases, depths, and tumor size. A significant in prognosis was observed between patients positive and negative for CA19-9 among those undergoing R0 resection. Multivariate analysis also revealed that serum CA19-9 was better than CEA as a prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: CA19-9 in the preoperative sera is a good prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients, although tumor markers continue to have only limited diagnostic usefulness.
OBJECTIVES: The clinical significance of preoperative serum levels of tumor markers CEA and CA19-9 was evaluated in gastric cancerpatients. METHODS: Serum levels of CEA and CA19-9 were measured in 663 patients with gastric cancer who underwent laparotomies over a recent 4-yr period (1990-1993). The correlations between the serum levels of tumor markers and several clinicopathological factors were evaluated by univariate analysis. The significance of the tumor markers as prognostic factors was assessed by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The positivity rates of CEA and CA19-9 were 16.6% and 16.0%, respectively. The positivity of CEA correlated well with the sex of the patients, hepatic, peritoneal, and nodal metastases and the depths of tumors, but it correlated weakly with a tumor's histological type. The positivity of CA19-9 correlated well with various forms of metastases, depths, and tumor size. A significant in prognosis was observed between patients positive and negative for CA19-9 among those undergoing R0 resection. Multivariate analysis also revealed that serum CA19-9 was better than CEA as a prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS:CA19-9 in the preoperative sera is a good prognostic factor in gastric cancerpatients, although tumor markers continue to have only limited diagnostic usefulness.
Authors: Daniele Marrelli; Alfonso De Stefano; Giovanni de Manzoni; Paolo Morgagni; Alberto Di Leo; Franco Roviello Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Gun Ick Hwang; Chang Hak Yoo; Byung Ho Sohn; Jun Ho Shin; Yong Lai Park; Heung Dai Kim; Yong Shin Kim; Won Kon Han; Won Kil Pae Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2004-06-30 Impact factor: 4.679