Literature DB >> 8560333

The accuracy of Risser staging.

Y Izumi1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study analyzed the accuracy of Risser sign staging on posteroanterior radiographs.
OBJECTIVE: To correlate the Risser sign on a posteroanterior radiograph with that on an anteroposterior radiograph. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: On the posteroanterior view of the spine, the full length of iliac apophysis is difficult to interpret. No report has assessed the relation of these findings.
METHODS: The staging of the Risser sign was examined in 89 girls. In 52 subjects, the stage of the Risser sign was identical on both views, whereas in 37 (42%) the interpretations were different.
RESULTS: On evaluation of the iliac apophysis using a skeletal specimen, the posteroanterior views produced a distorted image of the iliac apophysis, and the medial and lateral aspects of the apophysis were superimposed over the ilium.
CONCLUSIONS: As a result of these findings and the fact that the Risser staging was developed for the anteroposterior radiograph, the appearance of the iliac apophysis on the posteroanterior radiograph cannot be used as a reliable indicator of skeletal maturity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8560333     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199509000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  In brief: The Risser classification: a classic tool for the clinician treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jacques H Hacquebord; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The iliac crest in forensic age estimation: evaluation of three methods in pelvis X-rays.

Authors:  Viola Bartolini; Vilma Pinchi; Barbara Gualco; Stefano Vanin; Giusto Chiaracane; Giovanni D'Elia; Gian-Aristide Norelli; Martina Focardi
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  The "Risser+" grade: a new grading system to classify skeletal maturity in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M J Troy; P E Miller; N Price; V Talwalkar; F Zaina; S Donzelli; S Negrini; M T Hresko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The Risser sign for forensic age estimation in living individuals: a study of 643 pelvic radiographs.

Authors:  Daniel Wittschieber; Andreas Schmeling; Sven Schmidt; Walter Heindel; Heidi Pfeiffer; Volker Vieth
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.007

5.  Radiographic versus ultrasound evaluation of the Risser Grade in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study of 46 patients.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Gerhard Kaufmann; Iris Steingruber; Eckart Mayr; Michael Liebensteiner; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Improved accuracy in Risser sign grading with lateral spinal radiography.

Authors:  Tomasz Kotwicki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Automatic Risser Stage Assessment.

Authors:  Houda Kaddioui; Luc Duong; Julie Joncas; Christian Bellefleur; Imad Nahle; Olivier Chémaly; Marie-Lyne Nault; Stefan Parent; Guy Grimard; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-05-27

8.  The effect of compliance to a Rigo System Cheneau brace and a specific exercise programme on idiopathic scoliosis curvature: a comparative study: SOSORT 2014 award winner.

Authors:  LouAnn Rivett; Aimee Stewart; Joanne Potterton
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-05-30

9.  Evaluation of accuracy of plain radiography in determining the Risser stage and identification of common sources of errors.

Authors:  Jae Hyuk Yang; Amit Wasudeo Bhandarkar; Seung Woo Suh; Jae Young Hong; Jin Ho Hwang; Chang Hwa Ham
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  The classic: The iliac apophysis: an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. 1958.

Authors:  Joseph C Risser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.