Literature DB >> 8560316

Beneficence re-examined: protective intervention in mental health.

A D Murdach1.   

Abstract

Social workers have long reacted negatively to the idea of limiting client freedoms, seeing such activity as directly contrary to such central social work values as autonomy and self-determination. Nevertheless, practitioners often find themselves required to actively intervene in a protective manner when clients are unable to fend for themselves. Such interventions are increasingly a part of everyday practice as social workers respond to new mandates to provide services to disabled and vulnerable individuals. Because of these changing circumstances, the concept of beneficence and the process of protective treatment are currently being re-examined, especially in mental health. This article develops a conceptual model of protective intervention that can be used by clinical decision makers in a variety of situations. Case examples drawn from work with chronically mentally ill patients are used to illustrate the discussion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8560316     DOI: 10.1093/sw/41.1.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Work        ISSN: 0037-8046


  3 in total

1.  Professional dissonance: colliding values and job tasks in mental health practice.

Authors:  Melissa Floyd Taylor; Kia J Bentley
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2005-08

2.  Physical restraints: An ethical dilemma in mental health services in China.

Authors:  Junrong Ye; Aixiang Xiao; Lin Yu; Hongmei Wei; Chen Wang; Tianyun Luo
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2017-12-07

3.  Ethical consideration on use of seclusion in mental health services.

Authors:  Chaodun Zheng; Sijue Li; Yingmei Chen; Junrong Ye; Aixiang Xiao; Zhichun Xia; Yao Liao; Yu Xu; Yunlei Zhang; Lin Yu; Chen Wang; Jiankui Lin
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2019-10-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.