Literature DB >> 8560291

Home visits during pregnancy: consequences on pregnancy outcome, use of health services, and women's situations.

B Blondel1, G Bréart.   

Abstract

This review of eight randomized controlled trials assessed two different types of home visits during pregnancy: (1) those offering social support to high-risk women; and (2) those providing medical care to women with complications. In both categories, pregnancy outcome was not improved when women received home visits. The summary odds ratio for preterm delivery (< 37 weeks) was 1.0 (95% CI: 0.8 to 1.1). Nor did the home visits decrease the rate of hospital admission for women with complications (mainly threatened preterm labor or toxemia); the corresponding summary odds ratio was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.7 to 1.2). Nevertheless in some trials home visits had positive effects on women (medical knowledge, support levels, health habits, and satisfaction). The randomized controlled trials provide little evidence that programs offering home visits are effective in improving either pregnancy outcome or the use of health services. A better integration of hospital and home services might allow a more rational use of health services for women with complications. In addition, we need to define more precisely the content of home visits providing social support. For this, further research is required on how emotional support, health education, and advice influence the health of women and infants and mother-child interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8560291     DOI: 10.1016/s0146-0005(05)80040-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  6 in total

1.  How many visits by health professionals are needed to make a difference in low birthweight? A dose-response study of the Toronto Healthiest Babies Possible program.

Authors:  E Desjardins; D Hardwick
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

2.  The effect of expanding Medicaid prenatal services on birth outcomes.

Authors:  L M Baldwin; E H Larson; F A Connell; D Nordlund; K C Cain; M L Cawthon; P Byrns; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Dosage effect of prenatal home visiting on pregnancy outcomes in at-risk, first-time mothers.

Authors:  Neera K Goyal; Eric S Hall; Jareen K Meinzen-Derr; Robert S Kahn; Jodie A Short; Judith B Van Ginkel; Robert T Ammerman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  The effectiveness of antenatal care programmes to reduce infant mortality and preterm birth in socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer Hollowell; Laura Oakley; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Peter Brocklehurst; Ron Gray
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Relationship between implementing interpersonal communication and mass education campaigns in emergency settings and use of reproductive healthcare services: evidence from Darfur, Sudan.

Authors:  Izzeldin Fadl Adam; Keiko Nakamura; Masashi Kizuki; Rami Al Rifai; Urnaa Vanching
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Evidence from community level inputs to improve quality of care for maternal and newborn health: interventions and findings.

Authors:  Zohra S Lassi; Jai K Das; Rehana A Salam; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.223

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.