Literature DB >> 855997

Cefoxitin: clinical evaluation in thirty-eight patients.

P N Heseltine, D F Busch, R D Meyer, S M Finegold.   

Abstract

Clinical and bacteriological efficacy, patient tolerance, and toxicity of cefoxitin, a beta-lactamase-resistant cephamycin, were evaluated in 38 patients; 13 had soft tissue infection, 12 had pneumonia, 3 had urinary tract infection, 2 had peritonitis, and 4 had miscellaneous infections. In five patients, infection was clinically evident, though not bacteriologically proven. The latter patients were evaluated with regard to tolerance and toxicity only. Among the 34 infections in 33 patients, 71% were considered clinically cured; 86% of those patients who could be recultured were bacteriologically cured. Phlebitis was noted in 32% of the total group, and eosinophilia was observed in 16%. Unexplained deterioration in renal function occurred in two patients. Mean peak cefoxitin levels in serum were 72 mug/ml 30 min after a 2-g infusion and 32 mug/ml 30 min after a 1-g infusion. Cefoxitin was more active against facultatively and obligately anaerobic gram-negative organisms isolated from these patients than was cephalothin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 855997      PMCID: PMC352002          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.11.3.427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  16 in total

1.  Comparative incidence of phlebitis due to buffered cephalothin, cephapirin, and cefamandole.

Authors:  S Berger; E C Ernst; M Barza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  The cephalosporins. Microbiological, chemical, and pharmacological properties and use in chemotherapy of infection.

Authors:  L Weinstein; K Kaplan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Effects of rate of infusion and probenecid on serum levels, renal excretion, and tolerance of intravenous doses of cefoxitin in humans: comparison with cephalothin.

Authors:  C S Goodwin; E B Raftery; A D Goldberg; H Skeggs; A E Till; C M Martin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Cefoxitin and cephalothin: antimicrobial activity, human pharmacokinetics, and toxicology.

Authors:  W Brumfitt; J Kosmidis; J M Hamilton-Miller; J N Gilchrist
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Cefoxitin, a semisynthetic cephamycin antibiotic: antibacterial spectrum and resistance to hydrolysis by gram-negative beta-lactamases.

Authors:  H C Neu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Cefoxitin, a semisynthetic cephamycin antibiotic: susceptibility studies.

Authors:  H Wallick; D Hendlin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Cefoxitin, a new semi-synthetic cephamycin: an in-vitro and in-vivo comparison with cephalothin.

Authors:  J Kosmidis; J M Hamilton-Miller; J N Gilchrist; D W Kerry; W Brumfitt
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-12-15

8.  Cefoxitin, a semisynthetic cephamycin antibiotic: resistance to beta-lactamase inactivation.

Authors:  H R Onishi; D R Daoust; S B Zimmerman; D Hendlin; E O Stapley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Clinical studies of cefazolin and comparison with other cephalosporins.

Authors:  T Madhavan; E L Quinn; E Freimer; E J Fisher; F Cox; K Burch; D Pohlod
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Cephalosporinase activity in Bacteroides fragilis.

Authors:  V E Del Bene; W E Farrar
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  S M Finegold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of in vitro antibiograms of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates: differences in resistance rates in two institutions because of differences in susceptibility testing methodology.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; H M Wexler; C V Sanders; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Is it reasonable to use cephalosporins in respiratory and upper tract renal infections in hospitalized patients?

Authors:  R L Perkins
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1984-05

Review 4.  Treatment of respiratory tract infections with cephalosporin antibiotics.

Authors:  R Finch
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Clinical and bacteriological evaluation of cefoxitin therapy in children.

Authors:  J A Jacobson; J I Santos; W M Palmer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Prospective comparison of cefoxitin and cefazolin in infections caused by aerobic bacteria.

Authors:  M Gurwith; W Albritton; B Lank; G Harding; A Ronald
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Antimicrobial drugs used in the management of anaerobic infections in children.

Authors:  I Brook
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Cefoxitin: a review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  R N Brogden; R C Heel; T M Speight; G S Avery
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Results of a clinical trial of cefoxitin, a new cephamycin antibiotic.

Authors:  R V McCloskey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Penetration of cefoxitin into cerebrospinal fluid of infants and children with bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  W E Feldman; S Moffitt; N S Manning
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.