Literature DB >> 8558222

Outcome of extensive evaluation before adjuvant therapy in women with breast cancer and 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes.

M Crump1, P E Goss, M Prince, C Girouard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of extensive screening of women with high-risk, node-positive breast cancer on the detection of occult metastatic disease and patient eligibility for a randomized trial of the addition of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow support (ABMT) to standard adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with resected T1-3N1,2 primary breast cancer and > or = 10 positive axillary lymph nodes referred for possible trial participation were evaluated for this report. All had normal chest x-ray, bone scan, and liver ultrasound performed by the referring physician. Those who provided informed consent for the randomized trial were further evaluated according to protocol with computed tomographic (CT) scans of the head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis and bilateral bone marrow biopsies; those with metastatic disease detected by any of these tests were excluded from study registration.
RESULTS: Forty-four women were evaluated between February 1993 and April 1995. Fourteen did not undergo further protocol staging because of refusal to participate or the presence of metastatic disease on clinical assessment or review of outside radiologic studies. The remaining 30 underwent additional investigations, and seven (23%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12% to 41%) had metastases detected by CT scanning (four patients) or bone marrow biopsy (three patients) not detected by routine screening.
CONCLUSION: Although the number of patients evaluated is small, these data suggest that some of the improvement in outcome of women with > or = 10 positive axillary lymph nodes who receive ABMT as part of adjuvant chemotherapy in phase II trials may be from the exclusion of patients with occult metastatic disease. The importance of these exclusions can only be determined by ongoing, randomized controlled trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8558222     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Oncology '96].

Authors:  F Hartmann; M Pfreundschuh
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1997-02-15

2.  Interdisciplinary GoR level III Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Breast Cancer: Short version - AWMF Registry No.: 032-045OL AWMF-Register-Nummer: 032-045OL - Kurzversion 3.0, Juli 2012.

Authors:  R Kreienberg; U-S Albert; M Follmann; I B Kopp; T Kühn; A Wöckel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Clinical outcome of breast cancer patients with N3a (≥10 positive lymph nodes) disease: has it changed over years?

Authors:  Gul Basaran; Cabuk Devrim; Hale B Caglar; Bahadir Gulluoglu; Handan Kaya; Selcuk Seber; Taner Korkmaz; Ferhat Telli; Muharrem Kocak; Faysal Dane; Fulden P Yumuk; Serdar N Turhal
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Cancer prognosis using support vector regression in imaging modality.

Authors:  Xian Du; Sumeet Dua
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-10

5.  Baseline staging tests in primary breast cancer: a practice guideline.

Authors:  R E Myers; M Johnston; K Pritchard; M Levine; T Oliver
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Feasibility of whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of primary tumour, nodal and distant metastases in women with cancer during pregnancy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Sileny N Han; Frédéric Amant; Katrijn Michielsen; Frederik De Keyzer; Steffen Fieuws; Kristel Van Calsteren; Raphaëla C Dresen; Mina Mhallem Gziri; Vincent Vandecaveye
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.