Literature DB >> 8558201

Allogeneic marrow transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome with advanced disease morphology: a phase II study of busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and total-body irradiation and analysis of prognostic factors.

J E Anderson1, F R Appelbaum, G Schoch, T Gooley, C Anasetti, W I Bensinger, E Bryant, C D Buckner, T Chauncey, R A Clift.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if an intensive preparative regimen of busulfan (BU), cyclophosphamide (CY), and total-body irradiation (TBI) could improve outcome after marrow transplantation for advanced morphology myelodysplasia (refractory anemia with excess blasts [RAEB], RAEB in transformation [RAEB-T], and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia [CMML]) compared with that obtained with conventional CY/TBI and to analyze prognostic factors for transplantation for myelodysplasia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase II study was conducted of 31 patients (median age, 41 years) treated with BU (7 mg/kg), CY (50 mg/kg), TBI (12 Gy), and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched (n = 23) or -mismatched (n = 2) related or unrelated donor (n = 6) marrow transplantation. Results were compared with 44 historical control patients treated with CY (120 mg/kg) and TBI.
RESULTS: The 3-year actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) rate was similar for the BU/CY/TBI group and the CY/TBI group (23% v 30%, P = .6), but there were trends toward lower relapse rates (28% v 54%, P = .27) and higher nonrelapse mortality rates (68% v 36%, P = .12) among the current patients compared with historical controls. Multivariate analysis showed that a normal karyotype pretransplant and the use of methotrexate as part of posttransplant immunosuppression were associated with improved survival and reduced nonrelapse mortality. Univariate analysis showed significant differences in relapse rates based on marrow source (57% for HLA genotypically matched marrow v 18% for all others, P = .04) and on disease morphology (66% for RAEB-T v 38% for RAEB and CMML, P = .05).
CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced morphology myelodysplasia tolerated the intensified BU/CY/TBI preparative regimen and reduced posttransplant immunosuppression poorly. Novel transplant procedures are needed to reduce relapse rates without increasing nonrelapse mortality rates. In addition, transplantation before progression to RAEB-T, if possible, may reduce the risk of relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8558201     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  18 in total

Review 1.  Who is fit for allogeneic transplantation?

Authors:  H Joachim Deeg; Brenda M Sandmaier
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Long-term outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with intensified myeloablative conditioning for refractory myeloid malignancy.

Authors:  N Kawashima; Y Inamoto; T Sato; M Nakashima; Y Kagaya; K Watakabe; A Seto; N Fukushima; S Kurahashi; Y Ozawa; K Miyamura
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  [Oncology '96].

Authors:  F Hartmann; M Pfreundschuh
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1997-02-15

4.  Long term follow-up of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes using busulfan, cytosine arabinoside, and cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Ehab Atallah; Judith Abrams; Lois Ayash; Gail Bentley; Muneer Abidi; Voravit Ratanatharathorn; Joseph Uberti
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 5.  Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome: the past decade.

Authors:  Ekapun Karoopongse; H Joachim Deeg
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 6.  High-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: chemotherapy, transplantation, and beyond.

Authors:  Usama Gergis; Usama Wissa
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.952

7.  Granulocytic sarcoma presenting with severe adenopathy (cervical lymph nodes, tonsils, and adenoids) in a child with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and successful treatment with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  Toshihiko Imamura; Satoshi Matsuo; Takao Yoshihara; Tomohiro Chiyonobu; Kanako Mori; Hiroyuki Ishida; Yasutaka Nishimura; Yasuo Kasubuchi; Mayumi Naya; Akira Morimoto; Shigeyoshi Hibi; Shinsaku Imashuku
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.490

8.  Comparison of 2 preparative regimens for stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched sibling donors in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Yoo-Jin Kim; Dong-Wook Kim; Seok Lee; Chang-Ki Min; Dong-Gun Lee; Soo-Mi Choi; Ki-Seong Eom; Hee-Je Kim; Jong-Wook Lee; Woo-Sung Min; Chun-Choo Kim
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Transplantation in remission improves the disease-free survival of patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndromes treated with myeloablative T cell-depleted stem cell transplants from HLA-identical siblings.

Authors:  Hugo Castro-Malaspina; Ann A Jabubowski; Esperanza B Papadopoulos; Farid Boulad; James W Young; Nancy A Kernan; Miguel A Perales; Trudy N Small; Katharine Hsu; Michelle Chiu; Glenn Heller; Nancy H Collins; Suresh C Jhanwar; Marcel van den Brink; Stephen D Nimer; Richard J O'Reilly
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia arising from myelodysplastic syndrome: similar outcomes in patients with de novo disease and disease following prior therapy or antecedent hematologic disorders.

Authors:  Chunkang Chang; Barry E Storer; Bart L Scott; Eileen M Bryant; Howard M Shulman; Mary E Flowers; Brenda M Sandmaier; Robert P Witherspoon; Richard A Nash; Jean E Sanders; Antonio Bedalov; John A Hansen; Bruce E Clurman; Rainer Storb; Frederick R Appelbaum; H Joachim Deeg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.