Literature DB >> 8557899

Combination therapy with metoprolol and nifedipine versus monotherapy in patients with stable angina pectoris. Results of the International Multicenter Angina Exercise (IMAGE) Study.

S Savonitto1, D Ardissiono, K Egstrup, K Rasmussen, E A Bae, T Omland, P M Schjelderup-Mathiesen, P Marraccini, I Wahlqvist, P A Merlini, N Rehnqvist.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate whether combination therapy with metoprolol and nifedipine provides a greater anti-ischemic effect than does monotherapy in individual patients with stable angina pectoris.
BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with a beta-adrenergic blocking agent (which reduces myocardial oxygen consumption) and a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist (which increases coronary blood flow) is a logical approach to the treatment of stable angina pectoris. However, it is not clear whether, in individual patients, this combined therapy is more effective than monotherapy.
METHODS: Two hundred eighty patients with stable angina pectoris were enrolled in a double-blind trial in 25 European centers. Patients were randomized (week 0) to metoprolol (controlled release, 200 mg once daily) or nifedipine (Retard, 20 mg twice daily) for 6 weeks; placebo or the alternative drug was then added for a further 4 weeks. Exercise tests were performed at weeks 0, 6 and 10.
RESULTS: At week 6, both metoprolol and nifedipine increased the mean exercise time to 1-mm ST segment depression in comparison with week 0 (both p < 0.01); metoprolol was more effective than nifedipine (p < 0.05). At week 10, the groups randomized to combination therapy had a further increase in time to 1-mm ST segment depression (p < 0.05 vs. placebo). Analysis of the results in individual patients revealed that 7 (11%) of 63 patients adding nifedipine to metoprolol and 17 (29%) of 59 patients (p < 0.0001) adding metoprolol to nifedipine showed an increase in exercise tolerance that was greater than the 90th percentile of the distribution of the changes observed in the corresponding monotherapy + placebo groups. However, among these patients, an additive effect was observed only in 1 (14%) of the 7 patients treated with metoprolol + nifedipine and in 4 (24%) of the 17 treated with nifedipine + metoprolol.
CONCLUSIONS: The mean additive anti-ischemic effect shown by combination therapy with metoprolol and nifedipine in patients with stable angina pectoris is not the result of an additive effect in individual patients. Rather, it may be attributed to the recruitment by the second drug of patients not responding to monotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8557899     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00489-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  18 in total

1.  Coronary artery disease: part 2. Treatment.

Authors:  N Link; W Slater
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-05

2.  Effective management of stable angina.

Authors:  M Petticrew; M Sculpher; J Kelland; R Elliott; D Holdright; M Buxton
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-06

Review 3.  Metabolic therapy for ischemic heart disease: the rationale for inhibition of fatty acid oxidation.

Authors:  William C Stanley; Hani N Sabbah
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  Metabolic therapy for heart disease: impact of trimetazidine.

Authors:  Hani N Sabbah; William C Stanley
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  1,4-Dihydropyridines versus beta-blockers for hypertension: are either safe for the heart?

Authors:  F H Leenen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.727

6.  Treatment of refractory angina.

Authors:  Mark A Grise; Anil Verma
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2009

Review 7.  Trimetazidine. A review of its use in stable angina pectoris and other coronary conditions.

Authors:  K J McClellan; G L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Chronic coronary artery disease: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Andrew Cassar; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 9.  Aggressive medical management of coronary artery disease versus mechanical revascularization.

Authors:  Elaine Chiquette; Robert Chilton
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 10.  Drug treatment of stable angina pectoris in the elderly: defining the place of calcium channel antagonists.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Roger J C Hall
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.