Literature DB >> 8557844

Reconstitution of the rat olfactory epithelium after methyl bromide-induced lesion.

J E Schwob1, S L Youngentob, R C Mezza.   

Abstract

The olfactory epithelium and its neuronal population are known to have a substantial capacity to recover after either direct injury or damage to the olfactory nerve. However, the mechanisms underlying that capacity for recovery, and indeed the limits on the recovery process, are not well understood. The aim of this study is to describe in detail the way in which the olfactory epithelium reconstitutes after direct injury. Adult male rats were exposed to 330 ppm methyl bromide (MeBr) gas for a single 6-hour period. The exposure destroys all of the neurons and sustentacular cells in over 95% of the olfactory epithelium of food-restricted rats and in over 90% of the epithelium in ad-libitum-fed rats of the same weight, yet substantial recovery of the olfactory epithelium occurs. In response to the lesion, cellular proliferation increases markedly beginning between 24 and 48 hours, peaks at 1 week, and persists at levels higher than the control level for more than 4 weeks after MeBr exposure. Even though proliferation accelerates promptly, the beginning of neuronal reconstitution is delayed; only a few immature neurons are observed 3 days after the lesion, yet they reappear in large numbers by the end of the first week. The first mature neurons emerge between 7 and 14 days after lesion and increase to near normal numbers by 4-6 weeks. In association with the restoration of the neuronal population, basal cell proliferation returns to control levels between 4 and 6 weeks after damage. Likewise, sustentacular cells, identifiable by anticytokeratin 18 labeling, reappear rapidly and reform a distinct lamina in the superficial aspect of the epithelium. They closely resemble their counterparts in control epithelium with regard to disposition and shape by 3 weeks after lesion and with regard to expression of olfactory-specific cytochrome P450s by 8 weeks. Thus, most areas of the epithelium are restored to a near normal appearance and cellular composition by the end of 8 weeks, suggesting that the MeBr paradigm for lesioning the epithelium offers significant advantages over techniques such as Triton X-100 or ZnSO4 irrigation. However, not all measures of epithelial status are normal even at 8 weeks. Immature neurons remain slightly more numerous than normal at this time. Furthermore, some areas of the olfactory epithelium do not recover after MeBr lesion and are replaced by respiratory epithelium.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8557844     DOI: 10.1002/cne.903590103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  82 in total

1.  Globose basal cells are required for reconstitution of olfactory epithelium after methyl bromide lesion.

Authors:  Woochan Jang; Steven L Youngentob; James E Schwob
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2003-05-19       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Matrix metalloproteinase-9 and -2 expression in the olfactory bulb following methyl bromide gas exposure.

Authors:  Stephen R Bakos; James E Schwob; Richard M Costanzo
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Proliferation in the rat olfactory epithelium: age-dependent changes.

Authors:  E Weiler; A I Farbman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Adenoviral vector-mediated expression of B-50/GAP-43 induces alterations in the membrane organization of olfactory axon terminals in vivo.

Authors:  A J Holtmaat; W T Hermens; M A Sonnemans; R J Giger; F W Van Leeuwen; M G Kaplitt; A B Oestreicher; W H Gispen; J Verhaagen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Functional rehabilitation of cadmium-induced neurotoxicity despite persistent peripheral pathophysiology in the olfactory system.

Authors:  Lindsey A Czarnecki; Andrew H Moberly; Daniel J Turkel; Tom Rubinstein; Joseph Pottackal; Michelle C Rosenthal; Elizabeth F K McCandlish; Brian Buckley; John P McGann
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Transcriptional regulation of neurogenesis in the olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  Danette J Nicolay; J Ronald Doucette; Adil J Nazarali
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 5.046

7.  Toxin-induced chemosensory dysfunction: a case series and review.

Authors:  Wendy M Smith; Terence M Davidson; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.467

8.  Immunohistochemistry of the canine vomeronasal organ.

Authors:  J C Dennis; J G Allgier; L S Desouza; W C Eward; E E Morrison
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Global expression profiling of globose basal cells and neurogenic progression within the olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  Richard C Krolewski; Adam Packard; James E Schwob
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 10.  Stem and progenitor cells of the mammalian olfactory epithelium: Taking poietic license.

Authors:  James E Schwob; Woochan Jang; Eric H Holbrook; Brian Lin; Daniel B Herrick; Jesse N Peterson; Julie Hewitt Coleman
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.