BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory infection (ARI) is a major cause of childhood morbidity and mortality in developing countries. Community surveys are used to determine the proportion of children with ARI for whom care is sought by questioning mothers about the signs and symptoms of illness episodes. The validity of this approach has been studied infrequently. METHODS: We evaluated maternal reporting of signs and symptoms 2 and 4 weeks after diagnosis among 271 Egyptian children < 5 years old. Children with ARI were evaluated by physical examination, chest radiography, and pulse oximetry, and were alternately assigned for a maternal interview about the episode 14 or 28 days later. RESULTS: For radiographically-defined acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI), the sensitivity of several symptoms for combined open- and close-ended questions was relatively high: nahagan (deep or rapid breathing) (80%), nafas sarie (fast breathing) (66%), and kharfasha (coarse breath sounds) (63%). The specificity of these terms was 50-68%. The specificity was inversely related to the follow-up time. No term provided both a sensitivity and specificity of > 50% at day 28 across the radiographically, clinically- and pulse oximetry-based definitions of ALRI. Spontaneously mentioned karshet nafas (difficult or rapid breathing) at 14 days had a specificity and sensitivity for radiographic ALRI of 87% and 41%, respectively, suggesting that this term is a good choice for community surveys. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal reporting of ARI symptoms is non-specific 2 and 4 weeks after diagnosis but may be useful for monitoring trends in the proportion of children with pneumonia who receive medical care. To maximize specificity, ARI programmes should generally use a recall period of 2 weeks.
BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory infection (ARI) is a major cause of childhood morbidity and mortality in developing countries. Community surveys are used to determine the proportion of children with ARI for whom care is sought by questioning mothers about the signs and symptoms of illness episodes. The validity of this approach has been studied infrequently. METHODS: We evaluated maternal reporting of signs and symptoms 2 and 4 weeks after diagnosis among 271 Egyptian children < 5 years old. Children with ARI were evaluated by physical examination, chest radiography, and pulse oximetry, and were alternately assigned for a maternal interview about the episode 14 or 28 days later. RESULTS: For radiographically-defined acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI), the sensitivity of several symptoms for combined open- and close-ended questions was relatively high: nahagan (deep or rapid breathing) (80%), nafas sarie (fast breathing) (66%), and kharfasha (coarse breath sounds) (63%). The specificity of these terms was 50-68%. The specificity was inversely related to the follow-up time. No term provided both a sensitivity and specificity of > 50% at day 28 across the radiographically, clinically- and pulse oximetry-based definitions of ALRI. Spontaneously mentioned karshet nafas (difficult or rapid breathing) at 14 days had a specificity and sensitivity for radiographic ALRI of 87% and 41%, respectively, suggesting that this term is a good choice for community surveys. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal reporting of ARI symptoms is non-specific 2 and 4 weeks after diagnosis but may be useful for monitoring trends in the proportion of children with pneumonia who receive medical care. To maximize specificity, ARI programmes should generally use a recall period of 2 weeks.
Entities:
Keywords:
Africa; Arab Countries; Child Health; Developing Countries; Diseases; Egypt; Evaluation; Evaluation Report; Family And Household; Family Characteristics; Family Relationships; Health; Infections; Mediterranean Countries; Mothers; Northern Africa; Parents; Research Methodology; Respiratory Infections; Sampling Studies; Signs And Symptoms; Studies; Survey Methodology; Surveys
Authors: David R Marsh; Kate E Gilroy; Renee Van de Weerdt; Emmanuel Wansi; Shamim Qazi Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Karin Källander; Helena Hildenwall; Peter Waiswa; Edward Galiwango; Stefan Peterson; George Pariyo Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Delayehu Bekele; Bezawit Mesfin Hunegnaw; Chalachew Bekele; Kimiko Van Wickle; Fisseha Tadesse; Frederick G B Goddard; Yahya Mohammed; Sarah Unninayar; Grace J Chan Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Pascal Geldsetzer; Thomas Christie Williams; Amir Kirolos; Sarah Mitchell; Louise Alison Ratcliffe; Maya Kate Kohli-Lynch; Esther Jill Laura Bischoff; Sophie Cameron; Harry Campbell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Daniel R Feikin; Allan Audi; Beatrice Olack; Godfrey M Bigogo; Christina Polyak; Heather Burke; John Williamson; Robert F Breiman Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Tabish Hazir; Khadija Begum; Shams El Arifeen; Amira M Khan; M Hamidul Huque; Narjis Kazmi; Sushmita Roy; Saleem Abbasi; Qazi Sadeq-Ur Rahman; Evropi Theodoratou; Mahmuda Shayema Khorshed; Kazi Mizanur Rahman; Sanwarul Bari; M Mahfuzul Islam Kaiser; Samir K Saha; A S M Nawshad Uddin Ahmed; Igor Rudan; Jennifer Bryce; Shamim Ahmad Qazi; Harry Campbell Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jennifer Bryce; Fred Arnold; Ann Blanc; Attila Hancioglu; Holly Newby; Jennifer Requejo; Tessa Wardlaw Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 11.069