Literature DB >> 8555935

Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thromboembolic disorders: an international case-control study. Transnational Research Group on Oral Contraceptives and the Health of Young Women.

W O Spitzer1, M A Lewis, L A Heinemann, M Thorogood, K D MacRae.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test whether use of combined oral contraceptives containing third generation progestogens is associated with altered risk of venous thromboembolism.
DESIGN: Matched case-control study.
SETTING: 10 centres in Germany and United Kingdom.
SUBJECTS: Cases were 471 women aged 16-44 who had a venous thromboembolism. Controls were 1772 women (at least 3 controls per case) unaffected by venous thromboembolism who were matched with corresponding case for age and for hospital or community setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios derived with stratified analyses and unconditional logistic regression to adjust for potential confounding variables.
RESULTS: Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for venous thromboembolism were: for any oral contraceptives versus no use, 4.0 (3.1 to 5.3); for second generation products (low dose ethinyl-oestradiol, no gestodene or desogestrel) versus no use, 3.2 (2.3 to 4.3); for third generation products (low dose ethinyloestradiol, gestodene or desogestrel) versus no use, 4.8 (3.4 to 6.7); for third generation products versus second generation products, 1.5 (1.1 to 2.1); for products containing gestodene versus second generation products, 1.5 (1.0 to 2.2); and for products containing desogestrel versus second generation products, 1.5 (1.1 to 2.2). Probability of death due to venous thromboembolism for women using third generation products is about 20 per million users per year, for women using second generation products it is about 14 per million users per year, and for non-users it is five per million per year.
CONCLUSIONS: Risk of venous thromboembolism was slightly increased in users of third generation oral contraceptives compared with users of second generation products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8555935      PMCID: PMC2349742          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  8 in total

1.  The occurrence of lung cancer in man.

Authors:  M L LEVIN
Journal:  Acta Unio Int Contra Cancrum       Date:  1953

2.  Alterations in the serum levels of gestodene and SHBG during 12 cycles of treatment with 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 75 micrograms gestodene.

Authors:  H Kuhl; C Jung-Hoffmann; F Heidt
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Proportion of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait or intervention.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Attributable risk percent in case-control studies.

Authors:  P Cole; B MacMahon
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1971-11

Review 5.  Benefits and risks of combined oral contraceptives.

Authors:  M P Vessey
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.176

6.  Advances in oral contraception. An international review of levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol.

Authors:  J W Goldzieher
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 0.142

Review 7.  Oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease (first of two parts).

Authors:  B V Stadel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Interaction with the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and progestogens contained in oral contraceptives.

Authors:  C Jung-Hoffmann; H Kuhl
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.375

  8 in total
  67 in total

1.  The third generation oral contraceptive controversy. The evidence shows they are less safe than second generation pills.

Authors:  P A O'Brien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-25

2.  Admission for and mortality from primary venous thromboembolism in women of fertile age in Denmark, 1977-95.

Authors:  L Mellemkjaer; H T Sørensen; L Dreyer; J Olsen; J H Olsen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-25

Review 3.  Benefits and risks of third-generation oral contraceptives.

Authors:  E S Leblanc; A Laws
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Third generation oral contraceptives.

Authors:  D C Skegg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-22

5.  Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta-analysis.

Authors:  J M Kemmeren; A Algra; D E Grobbee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-21

6.  Risk of acute cerebrovascular events related to low oestrogen oral contraceptive treatment.

Authors:  U Scoditti; G P Buccino; M Pini; C Pattacini; D Mancia
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-02

Review 7.  Cardiovascular events associated with different combined oral contraceptives: a review of current data.

Authors:  P Hannaford
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Oral contraceptives, venous thromboembolism, and the courts.

Authors:  David C G Skegg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-09-07

9.  Antibiotic use and the development of Crohn's disease: methodological issues.

Authors:  V Schneider; S Suissa
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  A decade of safety-related regulatory action in the Netherlands: a retrospective analysis of direct healthcare professional communications from 1999 to 2009.

Authors:  Peter G M Mol; Sabine M J M Straus; Sigrid Piening; Jonie T N de Vries; Pieter A de Graeff; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.