Literature DB >> 8554223

Aspirin for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: prescribed use and outcomes.

H M Krumholz1, M J Radford, E F Ellerbeck, J Hennen, T P Meehan, M Petrillo, Y Wang, S F Jencks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine how often aspirin was prescribed as a discharge medication to eligible patients 65 years of age and older who were hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction; to identify patient characteristics associated with the decision to use aspirin; and to evaluate the association between prescription of aspirin at discharge and 6-month survival.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SETTING: All 352 nongovernment, acute care hospitals in Alabama, Connecticut, Iowa, and Wisconsin. PATIENTS: 5490 consecutive Medicare beneficiaries who survived an acute myocardial infarction, were hospitalized between June 1992 and February 1993, and did not have a contraindication to aspirin. MEASUREMENTS: Medical charts were reviewed to obtain information on the prescription of aspirin at discharge, contraindications, patient demographic characteristics, and clinical factors.
RESULTS: 4149 patients (76%) were prescribed aspirin at hospital discharge. In a multivariable analysis, an increased prescribed use of aspirin at discharge was correlated with several indicators of better overall health status (better left ventricular ejection fraction, absence of diabetes, shorter length of hospital stay, higher albumin level, and discharge to the patient's home). The prescribed use of aspirin at discharge was also associated with several specific patterns of care, including the use of cardiac procedures, beta-blocker therapy at discharge, and aspirin during the hospitalization. The prescribed use of aspirin at discharge was associated with a lower mortality rate 6 months after discharge compared with no prescribed aspirin (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.98), even after adjustment for baseline differences in demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin was not prescribed at discharge to 24% of elderly patients who were hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction and did not have a contraindication to aspirin. Several patient characteristics were associated with a higher risk for not being prescribed aspirin. Increasing the prescription of aspirin for these patients may provide an excellent opportunity to improve their care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8554223     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-3-199602010-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  26 in total

1.  Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms.

Authors:  S E Straus; F A McAlister
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-03       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Managed care and quality of care.

Authors:  H M Krumholz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  How good is the quality of health care in the United States? 1998.

Authors:  Mark A Schuster; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Robert H Brook
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 4.  Cardiovascular drug therapy in the elderly: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Jerome L Fleg; Wilbert S Aronow; William H Frishman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Confirmation of reported aspirin use in community studies: utility of serum thromboxane B2 measurement.

Authors:  Nicole Dodge Zantek; Russell V Luepker; Sue Duval; Karen Miller; Niki Oldenburg; Alan T Hirsch
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.389

6.  Training the evidence-based practitioner: university of Western States document on standards and competencies.

Authors:  Ronald P Lefebvre; David H Peterson; Mitchell Haas; Richard G Gillette; Charles W Novak; Janet Tapper; John P Muench
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2011

7.  Self-perceived evidence-based practice competencies: a survey of faculty and students at a chiropractic institution.

Authors:  Anjum S Odhwani; Pradip K Sarkar; Gene F Giggleman; Michelle M Holmes; Kathrine A Pohlman
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2021-03-01

8.  Inappropriate prescribing and related hospital admissions in frail older persons according to the STOPP and START criteria.

Authors:  Olivia Dalleur; Anne Spinewine; Séverine Henrard; Claire Losseau; Niko Speybroeck; Benoit Boland
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Development and psychometric evaluation of an evidence-based practice questionnaire for a chiropractic curriculum.

Authors:  Michael C Leo; Dave Peterson; Mitchell Haas; Ron LeFebvre; Shireesh Bhalerao
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Evaluation of the effects of an evidence-based practice curriculum on knowledge, attitudes, and self-assessed skills and behaviors in chiropractic students.

Authors:  Mitchell Haas; Michael Leo; David Peterson; Ron Lefebvre; Darcy Vavrek
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.