Literature DB >> 8552852

Education program for general practitioners on breast and cervical cancer screening: a randomized trial. PRE.SA.GF Collaborative Group.

J P Boissel1, J P Collet, A Alborini, J C Cordel, J Filsnoel, J Gillet, C Nemoz, A Brémond, G Bernhard, J F Bourdin.   

Abstract

This study was aimed at evaluating the effects of an education program for general practitioners on their prescribing behaviour for cervical and breast cancer screening tests, and assessing the feasibility of general practitioners participation in screening programs. All three cytology laboratories and 19 of the 20 radiologists in one administrative region ("Haute-Savoie") in France agreed to participate. The 278 general practices in this region were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (a one-day seminar on screening for breast cancer and cervical cancer) or the control group (n for both = 139). The prescriptions of tests for the following year were noted from the laboratories' and radiologists' records. No significant differences were observed between the intervention group and the control group for the number of mammographies prescribed with a mean of 19.3 and 15.2 per practice, respectively. However, significantly more mammographies were prescribed in women aged over 50 by the intervention group (p = 0.038). Inversely, fewer smear tests were prescribed in the intervention group (mean per practice: 40.5 and 46.1, respectively). A significantly higher number of practices in the intervention group did not prescribe any smear tests (p = 0.007). This study suggests that it is possible to influence general practitioners' participation in screening programs, but that the messages should be carefully presented, since negative effects are possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8552852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique        ISSN: 0398-7620            Impact factor:   1.019


  7 in total

1.  Is participation in research as an investigator an effective form of continuing medical education?

Authors:  D Huas; P Wallace
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Louise Forsetlund; Mary Ann O'Brien; Lisa Forsén; Liv Merete Reinar; Mbah P Okwen; Tanya Horsley; Christopher J Rose
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-15

Review 3.  Enhancing community delivery of tissue plasminogen activator in stroke through community-academic collaborative clinical knowledge translation.

Authors:  Phillip A Scott
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations.

Authors:  Philippa Davies; Anne E Walker; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Louise Forsetlund; Arild Bjørndal; Arash Rashidian; Gro Jamtvedt; Mary Ann O'Brien; Fredric Wolf; Dave Davis; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

Review 6.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Thomas Everett; Andrew Bryant; Michelle F Griffin; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Carol A Forbes; Ruth G Jepson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11

Review 7.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Helen Staley; Aslam Shiraz; Norman Shreeve; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Ketankumar Gajjar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.