Literature DB >> 8551492

Randomised, double-blind, parallel study of the anti-hypertensive efficacy and safety of losartan potassium compared with felodipine ER in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

J C Chan1, J A Critchley, J T Lappe, S J Raskin, D Snavely, A I Goldberg, C S Sweet.   

Abstract

This study investigated the anti-hypertensive efficacy and tolerability of once-daily losartan potassium (50 mg titrated to 100 mg), an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, compared with once daily felodipine extended release (ER) (5 mg titrated to 10 mg), a calcium channel blocker, after 12 weeks of therapy in elderly hypertensive patients. Following a 4-week, single-blind, placebo baseline period, qualifying patients were randomly allocated to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with losartan potassium or felodipine ER. After 6 weeks, patients with a 24 h post-dose sitting diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mm Hg had their dose doubled for the remaining 6 weeks. At 6 weeks, there was a greater BP response for felodipine ER than losartan potassium in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension. However, after 12 weeks of therapy, losartan potassium reduced BP as effectively as felodipine ER with no differences in mean BP reduction or anti-hypertensive response category between treatment groups. In this study, both treatments were well tolerated; felodipine ER was associated with a numerically higher incidence of headache and oedema while the incidence of asthenia was numerically higher in losartan-treated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8551492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  9 in total

1.  Start of therapy with the angiotensin II antagonist losartan after immediate switch from pretreatment with an ACE inhibitor.

Authors:  J Scholze; M Stapff
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  A risk-benefit assessment of losartan potassium in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  L M Burrell
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Losartan: a review of its use, with special focus on elderly patients.

Authors:  K L Simpson; K J McClellan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Spectrum of use for the angiotensin-receptor blocking drugs.

Authors:  M E Fabiani; C I Johnston
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  Losartan potassium: a review of its pharmacology, clinical efficacy and tolerability in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  K L Goa; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of vasodilators. Part I.

Authors:  R Kirsten; K Nelson; D Kirsten; B Heintz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  The antihypertensive efficacy of losartan and amlodipine assessed with office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Canadian Cozaar Hyzaar Amlodipine Trial Study Group.

Authors:  T W Wilson; Y Lacourcière; C C Barnes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-09-08       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Fifteen years of losartan: what have we learned about losartan that can benefit chronic kidney disease patients?

Authors:  Elizabeth Ripley; Ari Hirsch
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2010-06-28

Review 9.  Angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Potential in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  L M Burrell; C I Johnston
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.271

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.