Literature DB >> 8550942

Effect of release time in compression hearing aids: paired-comparison judgments of quality.

A C Neuman1, M H Bakke, C Mackersie, S Hellman, H Levitt.   

Abstract

Paired-comparison judgments of quality were obtained from 20 hearing-impaired listeners for speech processed through simulated compression hearing aids varying in release time (60, 200, 1000 ms) at three different compression ratios (1.5, 2, 3:1) and for three different background noises (ventilation, apartment, cafeteria). Analysis revealed that the main effect of release time did not have a significant effect on perceived quality. The interaction between release time and noise type was found to be significant. While no significant difference in preference for release times was evident for the ventilation noise, the longer release times (200 and 1000 ms) were preferred for the higher level noises (apartment noise, cafeteria noise). Post hoc testing revealed that the mean preference scores for the 200- and 1000-ms release time were significantly greater than that of the 60-ms release time with the competing cafeteria noise (p < 0.05). Analysis of individual subject data revealed statistically significant preferences that differed from the group mean, suggesting that individualized fitting of this parameter of a compression hearing aid might be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8550942     DOI: 10.1121/1.413807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.

Authors:  C V Palmer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-03

2.  Effect of hearing aid release time and presentation level on speech perception in noise in elderly individuals with hearing loss.

Authors:  Jijo Pottackal Mathai; Hasheem Mohammed
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Gregory Ellis; Kendra Marks; Richard Wright; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Effects of Adaptation Rate and Noise Suppression on the Intelligibility of Compressed-Envelope Based Speech.

Authors:  Ying-Hui Lai; Yu Tsao; Fei Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Can Dual Compression Offer Better Mandarin Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality Than Fast-Acting Compression?

Authors:  Yuan Chen; Lena L N Wong; Volker Kuehnel; Jinyu Qian; Solveig Christina Voss; Wang Shangqiguo
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.