Literature DB >> 8549868

Effects of cilazapril and amlodipine on kidney function in hypertensive NIDDM patients.

M Velussi1, E Brocco, F Frigato, M Zolli, B Muollo, M Maioli, A Carraro, G Tonolo, P Fresu, A M Cernigoi, P Fioretto, R Nosadini.   

Abstract

Contrasting information has been reported concerning the course of renal function in NIDDM with hypertension alone or in association with renal damage. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the course of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in hypertensive NIDDM patients during antihypertensive therapy. Furthermore, we compared the effects of ACE inhibitors (cilazapril, Inibace, Roche, Milan, Italy) and Ca(2+)-channel blockers (amlodipine, Norvasc, Pfizer, Rome, Italy). Of the hypertensive NIDDM patients attending the outpatient's clinic of the internal medicine departments of the University of Padova and Sassari, 44 participated in the present study. Of these patients, 26 were normoalbuminuric and 18 microalbuminuric. They were randomly treated with either cilazapril or amlodipine. The target of antihypertensive treatment was a value < 140 mmHg for systolic and 85 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (BP). Microalbuminuria was defined as an albumin excretion rate (AER) between 20 and 200 micrograms/min. GFR was measured by plasma clearance of 51Cr-labeled EDTA at baseline and every 6-12 months during a 3-year follow-up interval. A significant decrease was observed in the values of GFR, AER, and systolic and diastolic BP in normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric patients during antihypertensive therapy. The GFR fall in the overall population of NIDDM patients was significantly and inversely related to the decrease of mean BP (diastolic + 1/3 pulse pressure) (r = -0.80, P < 0.0001) but not to that of HbA1c, triglycerides, and BMI. The GFR decline (mean +/- SE) per year in the normoalbuminuric patient was 2.03 +/- 0.66 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2 (95% CI 0.92-3.17) during cilazapril and 2.01 +/- 0.71 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2 (95% CI 0.82-3.11) during amlodipine therapy. The GFR decline per year in the microalbuminuric patient was 2.15 +/- 0.69 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2 (95% CI 0.86-3.89) during cilazapril and 2.33 +/- 0.83 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2 per year (95% CI 1.03-3.67) during amlodipine therapy. Cilazapril and amlodipine lowered AER to a similar extent in normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric patients. No significant changes were observed concerning other clinical and biochemical features between the two antihypertensive therapies and particularly HbA1c, BMI, triglycerides, and cholesterol plasma values. These results support the tenet that arterial hypertension plays a pivotal role in contributing to renal damage in NIDDM, even when AER is normal. However, the degree of BP control, with both cilazapril and amlodipine, can successfully delay the slope of GFR decline in hypertensive NIDDM patients with or without incipient nephropathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8549868     DOI: 10.2337/diab.45.2.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes        ISSN: 0012-1797            Impact factor:   9.461


  20 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic modalities in diabetic nephropathy: standard and emerging approaches.

Authors:  Emaad M Abdel-Rahman; Lawand Saadulla; W Brian Reeves; Alaa S Awad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Diabetic nephropathy. Its relationship to hypertension and means of pharmacological intervention.

Authors:  T Baba; S Neugebauer; T Watanabe
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Use of calcium antagonists in renal patients: therapeutic benefit or medical malpractice?

Authors:  Douglas A Nigbor; Julia B Lewis
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Evidence-based practice guideline for the treatment of CKD.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.801

5.  Do calcium channel blockers increase the risk of myocardial infarction in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus?

Authors:  L Park; C P Por; M F Evans
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Endothelial function and the kidney. An emerging target for cardiovascular therapy.

Authors:  T J Rabelink; H A Koomans
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  The calcium channel blocker controversy in patients with diabetic nephropathy: Is there an issue?

Authors:  L M Ruilope; C Campo; J Segura
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 8.  Antihypertensive drugs and the kidney.

Authors:  Mitra K Nadim; Renee Dua; Vito M Campese
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Treatment of hypertension in diabetic patients with nephropathy.

Authors:  R Komers; S Anderson
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 10.  Lessons from trials in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Luis M Ruilope
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.