Literature DB >> 8548706

Factors influencing the emigration of physicians from Canada to the United States.

R J McKendry1, G A Wells, P Dale, O Adam, L Buske, J Strachan, L Flor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether location of postgraduate medical training and other factors are associated with the emigration of physicians from Canada to the United States.
DESIGN: Case-control study, physicians were surveyed with the use of a questionnaire mailed in May 1994 (with a reminder sent in September 1994), responses to which were accepted until Dec. 31, 1994. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians randomly selected from the CMA database, 4000 with addresses in Canada and 4000 with current addresses in the United States and previous addresses in Canada. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sex, age, location of undergraduate and postgraduate medical training, qualifications, practice location, opinions concerning residence decisions, current satisfaction and plans.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 49.6% (50.0% among physicians in the United States and 49.2% among those in Canada). Age and sex distributions were similar among the 8000 questionnaire recipients and the nearly 4000 respondents. Physicians living in the United States were more likely to be older (mean 53.2 v. 49.6 years of age), male (87% v. 75%) and specialists (79% v. 52%) than those practising in Canada. Postgraduate training in the United States was associated with subsequent emigration (odds ratio 9.2, 95% confidence interval 7.8 to 10.7). However, in rating the importance of nine factors in the decision to emigrate or remain in Canada, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the rating assigned to location of postgraduate training. Professional factors rated most important by most physicians in both groups were professional/clinical autonomy, availability of medical facilities and job availability. Remuneration was considered an equally important factor by those in Canada and in the United States. Six of seven personal/family factors were rated as more important to their choice of practice location by respondents in Canada than by those in the United States. Current satisfaction was significantly higher among respondents in the United States. Most physicians in each group planned to continue practising at their current location. Of Canadian respondents, 22% indicated that they were more likely to move to the United States than they were a year beforehand, whereas 4% of US respondents indicated that they were more likely to return to Canada.
CONCLUSIONS: Factors affecting the decision to move to the United States or remain in Canada can be categorized as "push" factors (e.g., government involvement) and "pull" factors (e.g., better geographic climate in the US). Factors can also be categorized by whether they are amenable to change (e.g., availability of medical facilities) or cannot be managed (e.g., proximity of relatives). An understanding of the reasons why physicians immigrate to the United States or remain in Canada is essential to planning physician resources nationally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8548706      PMCID: PMC1488117     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  6 in total

1.  Toward integrated medical resource policies for Canada: 9. Postgraduate training and specialty certification.

Authors:  M L Barer; G L Stoddart
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Movement of MDs between Canada and US not a one-way flow.

Authors:  E Godley
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  After I looked south, the north didn't look so bad.

Authors:  B Goldman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Determination of significant relative risks and optimal sampling procedures in prospective and retrospective comparative studies of various sizes.

Authors:  S D Walter
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  US recruiting firms delighted by prospect of Canadian limits on MDs' right to practise.

Authors:  J Rafuse
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Physicians who have practiced in both the United States and Canada compare the systems.

Authors:  G J Hayes; S C Hayes; T Dykstra
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.308

  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  The Canadian Medical Association's Policy on Physician Health and Well-being.

Authors:  D Puddester
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-01

2.  National and provincial retention of medical graduates of Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Authors:  Maria Mathews; James T B Rourke; Amanda Park
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The Canadian contribution to the US physician workforce.

Authors:  Robert L Phillips; Stephen Petterson; George E Fryer; Walter Rosser
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Analysis of international migration patterns affecting physician supply in Canada.

Authors:  Mamoru Watanabe; Melanie Comeau; Lynda Buske
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-05

5.  Retention of international medical graduates following postgraduate medical training in newfoundland and labrador.

Authors:  Maria Mathews; Amanda Park; James T B Rourke
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2007-11

6.  Neurosurgery workforce in Canada, 1996 to 2011. Canadian Neurosurgical Society.

Authors:  H Hugenholtz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Intention to relocate to the United States.

Authors:  P C Ma; L K Chan; X Huynh
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Determinants of first practice location: among Manitoba medical graduates.

Authors:  Malathi Raghavan; William Fleisher; Allan Downs; Bruce Martin; J Dean Sandham
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Shifting tides in the emigration patterns of Canadian physicians to the United States: a cross-sectional secondary data analysis.

Authors:  Thomas R Freeman; Stephen Petterson; Sean Finnegan; Andrew Bazemore
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.