Literature DB >> 8547760

Profiling fluent aphasic spontaneous speech: a comparison of two methodologies.

S Edwards1.   

Abstract

Grammatical features of fluent aphasic speakers have not received as much attention as those exhibited by non-fluent aphasic speakers. In part, this neglect reflects the difficulty of applying consistent analytical procedures to fluent aphasic speech. For the analytical process to be meaningful, the methodology must be robust, replicable and capable of dealing with the voluble and non-specific output which is often typical of these speakers, and yet be sensitive enough to reveal subtle grammatical differences between aphasic and normal speech. In this paper the methodological problems encountered in applying analytical procedures to spontaneous speech data are discussed. Two different procedures for analysing speech data are compared and applied to samples of fluent aphasic and normal speech. Both procedures reveal that (compared with normal speakers), although these aphasic speakers are capable of producing some well-constructed grammatical structures, the distribution of these structures may differ compared with the distribution exhibited by normal speakers. These results suggest that complex aspects of grammatical organisation may be compromised in some fluent aphasic speakers.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8547760     DOI: 10.3109/13682829509021446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Disord Commun        ISSN: 0963-7273


  4 in total

1.  Investigating the origin of nonfluency in aphasia: A path modeling approach to neuropsychology.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Finding the Right Words: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Improves Discourse Productivity in Non-fluent Aphasia After Stroke.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Catherine Norise; Olufunsho Faseyitan; H Branch Coslett; Peter E Turkeltaub; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.773

3.  Manual Versus Automated Narrative Analysis of Agrammatic Production Patterns: The Northwestern Narrative Language Analysis and Computerized Language Analysis.

Authors:  Chien-Ju Hsu; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Neural encoding and production of functional morphemes in the posterior temporal lobe.

Authors:  Daniel K Lee; Evelina Fedorenko; Mirela V Simon; William T Curry; Brian V Nahed; Dan P Cahill; Ziv M Williams
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 14.919

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.