Literature DB >> 8546292

The accuracy of references in Anaesthesia.

M Asano1, K Mikawa, K Nishina, N Maekawa, H Obara.   

Abstract

We reviewed all the references quoted in Volume 45 (1990) (n = 3967) and half the references quoted in Volume 49 (1994) (n = 2183) of Anaesthesia. The references were numbered sequentially and 100 references from each year were randomly selected. Citations of non-journal articles were omitted leaving 197 citations for careful scrutiny. The authors' names, article title, journal title, volume number, page numbers, and year were examined in each selected reference. A reference was deemed correct if each element of the citation was identical to its source. Of the references examined, 32% and 41% contained one or more errors in 1990 and 1994, respectively. The elements most likely to be inaccurate were, in descending order of frequency, article title, author, and page number. There was no significant difference in the error rate between the 2 years. It is the responsibility of contributors to ensure that all references are carefully checked.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8546292     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05956.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  3 in total

1.  Accuracy of references in five biomedical informatics journals.

Authors:  Dominik Aronsky; Joel Ransom; Kevin Robinson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Accuracy of references in the ophthalmic literature.

Authors:  Gale Oren; Maureen Watson
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2009-04

Review 3.  Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wager; Philippa Middleton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.