Literature DB >> 8545865

Kidney-pancreas transplantation. The effect of portal versus systemic venous drainage of the pancreas on the lipoprotein composition.

T A Hughes1, A O Gaber, H S Amiri, X Wang, D S Elmer, R P Winsett, D K Hathaway, S M Hughes.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that both kidney-alone and combined kidney-pancreas transplantation lower VLDL and IDL apoB while increasing LDL apoB, apoA-I, and HDL free cholesterol (FC). In this report, we analyze the lipoproteins of 31 patients who have undergone combined kidney-pancreas transplantation. Systemic venous drainage of the pancreas was utilized in 20 of these patients while 11 had portal venous drainage. Six lipoprotein subfractions (VLDL, IDL, LDL, HDL-L, HDL-M, HDL-D) were isolated by rapid gradient ultracentrifugation using a fixed-angle rotor. The apolipoprotein (by reverse-phase HPLC) and lipid (by enzymatic assays) composition of each subfraction was determined. After three months, there were few group differences. However, the portal group had substantial reductions in VLDL apoB at both six (-50% vs. +1%) and twelve months (-57% vs. +149%, P = .042) while the systemic group had increases in VLDL apoB. Similar differences were seen in IDL apoB (six months: -38% vs. +13%; twelve months: -61% vs. +56%, P = .008). LDL apoB increased in both groups at six months (portal: +7%; systemic: +30%) but fell in the portal group at twelve months (-17% vs. +41%, P = .0007). IDL triglyceride, cholesterol ester, phospholipids, and free cholesterol also fell by 19% to 47% in the portal group while they rose by 8% to 44% in the systemic patients, six and twelve months after surgery (P < .05). In addition, the VLDL and LDL free cholesterol to phospholipid ratios (FC/PL) fell (improved) by 16% to 26% in the portal patients while they rose by 9% to 28% in the systemic subjects during this time (P < .04). Finally, there were substantial improvements in the LDL composition of the portal patients compared to the systemic patients at six (PL/apoB: +23% vs. -16%, P = .005; CE/apoB: +14% vs. -14%, P = .037) and twelve months (PL/apoB: +39% vs. -13%, P = .011; CE/apoB: +41% vs. -15%, P = .011). These data indicate that portal drainage of the transplanted pancreas reduced the number of VLDL, IDL, and LDL particles, reduced the total mass of IDL (by 35%), and normalized the VLDL and LDL particle composition. These improvements were not seen in the patients who received systemic drainage of their pancreas. HDL-M also improved in the portal patients (TG: -29% vs. +12%, P = .025) (PL: +22% vs. -5%, P = .014) (total mass: +16% vs. +0.2%, P = .044) but not in the systemic patients six months after surgery. These results suggest that portal venous drainage of the pancreas leads to greater improvements in the lipoprotein composition of IDDM patients than does systemic drainage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8545865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  7 in total

1.  Superiority of portal venous drainage over systemic venous drainage in pancreas transplantation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  B Philosophe; A C Farney; E J Schweitzer; J O Colonna; B E Jarrell; V Krishnamurthi; A M Wiland; S T Bartlett
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Calcineurin inhibitors and post-transplant hyperlipidaemias.

Authors:  R Moore; D Hernandez; H Valantine
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Post-transplant hyperlipidaemia.

Authors:  R M Jindal
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  A prospective comparison of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation with systemic-enteric versus portal-enteric drainage.

Authors:  R J Stratta; M H Shokouh-Amiri; M F Egidi; H P Grewal; A T Kizilisik; N Nezakatgoo; L W Gaber; A O Gaber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Evolution in pancreas transplantation techniques: simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation using portal-enteric drainage without antilymphocyte induction.

Authors:  R J Stratta; A O Gaber; M H Shokouh-Amiri; K S Reddy; R R Alloway; M F Egidi; H P Grewal; L W Gaber; D Hathaway
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Portal venous and enteric exocrine drainage versus systemic venous and bladder exocrine drainage of pancreas grafts: clinical outcome of 40 consecutive transplant recipients.

Authors:  M S Cattral; D L Bigam; A W Hemming; A Carpentier; P D Greig; E Wright; E Cole; D Donat; G F Lewis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Evolving surgical strategies for pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  David B Leeser; Stephen T Bartlett
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.