Literature DB >> 8545860

Reduced human IgG anti-ATGAM antibody formation in renal transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil.

J A Kimball1, M D Pescovitz, B K Book, D J Norman.   

Abstract

Exposure to the equine-derived polyclonal antithymocyte preparation, ATGAM, frequently elicits human anti-ATGAM antibody formation. The influence of concomitant immunosuppressants on this antiantibody response has not been established. We therefore evaluated IgG antibody formation to ATGAM in 47 patients receiving ATGAM as part of a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for maintenance immunosuppression after primary cadaveric renal transplantation. All patients received ATGAM for induction of immunosuppression plus methylprednisolone, prednisone, and cyclosporine. In addition, patients were randomized to receive maintenance immunosuppression consisting of either azathioprine (AZA) 1-2 mg/kg/day, mycophenolate mofetil 2 gm/day (MMF2), or mycophenolate mofetil 3 gm/day (MMF3). Patient sequential sera were independently tested for IgG anti-ATGAM antibody by 2 laboratories, which were blinded to treatment arm assignments, using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Both laboratories found significantly greater anti-ATGAM antibody formation in group AZA compared with groups MMF2 and MMF3: laboratory 1 reported sensitization rates in the 3 groups of 94% (AZA), 50% (MMF2) (P < 0.02 vs. AZA), and 60% (MMF3) (P < 0.05 vs. AZA); and laboratory 2 reported rates of 67% (AZA), 17% (MMF2) (P < 0.02 vs. AZA), and 10% (MMF3) (P < 0.02 vs. AZA). In addition, fewer patients formed high titer antibody in the MMF arms compared to the AZA arm: 56% (AZA), 0% (MMF2) (P < 0.02 vs. AZA), and 20% (MMF3) (P < 0.02 vs. AZA) of patients for laboratory 1; and 20% (AZA), 0% (MMF2) (P < 0.05 vs. AZA), and 0% (MMF3) (P < 0.05 vs. AZA) of patients for laboratory 2. Differences in test results between the 2 laboratories were explained by differences in the sensitivity of their respective immunoassays and in the criteria used for assigning a positive result to test specimens. In this protocol, MMF at 2-3 gm/day was associated with a reduced incidence and titer of IgG anti-ATGAM antibody formation compared with standard azathioprine dosing. Although MMF previously has been reported to inhibit T cell responses that mediate acute cellular rejection, this is the first demonstration that MMF significantly inhibits human B cell responses to antigen in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8545860     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199560120-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

Review 1.  Mycophenolate mofetil: effects on cellular immune subsets, infectious complications, and antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  M L Ritter; L Pirofski
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Development of population PK model with enterohepatic circulation for mycophenolic acid in patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Catherine M T Sherwin; Anna Carmela P Sagcal-Gironella; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Hermine I Brunner; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Pharmacotherapy of lupus nephritis in children: a recommended treatment approach.

Authors:  Alexa Adams; Emma Jane MacDermott; Thomas J A Lehman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Preliminary risk-benefit assessment of mycophenolate mofetil in transplant rejection.

Authors:  W D Simmons; S C Rayhill; H W Sollinger
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Mycophenolate mofetil. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy in renal transplantation.

Authors:  B Fulton; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Humoral Response of Renal Transplant Recipients to the BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Using Both RBD IgG and Neutralizing Antibodies.

Authors:  Tammy Hod; Aharon Ben-David; Liraz Olmer; Itzchak Levy; Ronen Ghinea; Eytan Mor; Yaniv Lustig; Galia Rahav
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 5.385

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.