Literature DB >> 8545671

Process and outcomes in general practice consultations: problems in defining high quality care.

H R Winefield1, T G Murrell, J Clifford.   

Abstract

In order to explore the relationships between the verbal interactions of the consultation and several outcomes (patient health change, patient compliance and the satisfaction of both doctor and patient), 21 General Practitioners contributed ten audiotaped consultations each, from consecutive consenting adult patients. The effects of GP sex and postgraduate training were also investigated, but were found to be minimal. Patient health change was most clearly related to acuteness of symptoms at presentation, whereas reported compliance was predicted by patient satisfaction after the consultation. Different consultations were maximally satisfying for doctors and for patients, and patient and doctor satisfaction with specific consultations showed little correlation. This result implies that the measurement of quality of care, in general practice at least, is a more complex task than has been assumed, and in turn raises issues about whose definition of outcome is relevant in discussing quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8545671     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00403-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  13 in total

1.  Expectations of health care: promoted, managed or shared?

Authors:  Julian Tudor Hart
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Exploring the consumer's and provider's perspective on service quality in community mental health care.

Authors:  Karen Mason; Antonio Olmos-Gallo; Donald Bacon; Michael McQuilken; Aimee Henley; Steve Fisher
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2004-02

3.  Satisfaction with the outpatient encounter: a comparison of patients' and physicians' views.

Authors:  Linda C Zandbelt; Ellen M A Smets; Frans J Oort; Mieke H Godfried; Hanneke C J M de Haes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The impact of automated screening with Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) on health-related quality of life, supportive care needs, and patient satisfaction with care in 268 ambulatory cancer patients.

Authors:  Benjamin D Diplock; Kaitlin M C McGarragle; Willem A Mueller; Sana Haddad; Rachel Ehrlich; Dong-Hyun A Yoon; Xingshan Cao; Yaseen Al-Allaq; Paul Karanicolas; Margaret I Fitch; Jeff Myers; Alex J Mitchell; Janet W M Ellis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Identifying Primary Care Pathways from Quality of Care to Outcomes and Satisfaction Using Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Sarah Stevens; Andrew R H Dalton; Robert I Griffiths; John L Campbell; Jose M Valderas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Ethical principles for physician rating sites.

Authors:  Daniel Strech
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  How do GPs in Switzerland perceive their patients' satisfaction and expectations? An observational study.

Authors:  Paul Sebo; François R Herrmann; Dagmar M Haller
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Putting health status guided COPD management to the test: protocol of the MARCH study.

Authors:  Janwillem Kocks; Corina de Jong; Marjolein Y Berger; Huib A M Kerstjens; Thys van der Molen
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.317

9.  To make a difference--how GPs conceive consultation outcomes. A phenomenographic study.

Authors:  Annika Andén; Sven-Olof Andersson; Carl-Edvard Rudebeck
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Construction of a questionnaire measuring outpatients' opinion of quality of hospital consultation departments.

Authors:  Isabelle Gasquet; Sylvie Villeminot; Carla Estaquio; Pierre Durieux; Philippe Ravaud; Bruno Falissard
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.